Once solid lines of demarcation between the major societal sectors: business, government and nonprofits, are increasingly blurred. The ever-growing power of transnational corporations, brought about in part by globalization and mass commercialization, along with the notable shift of government duties to the private sector, has compounded this haziness.
Between business and nonprofits specifically, it has been argued that the advance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has encroached on territory that was once the dominion of NGOs. Nonprofit (used interchangeably with NGO) operations, including public and governmental advocacy and environmental stewardship, are increasingly falling under the corporate umbrella. Socially conscious and highly educated talent, who traditionally flocked to nonprofit roles, now enjoy expanded options in business, potentially eroding the nonprofit workforce. Therefore, the question arises, is the nonprofit sector threatened by the increasing prevalence of business in the social sphere?
The answer is No. If anything, CSR expands the opportunities available to civil society organizations in some of the following ways:
1. Advances in Funding: Corporate endowments, foundation funding, cause-related marketing and other channels of nonprofit funds are part and parcel of many for-profit CSR initiatives. While contributions to like-minded NGOs do not replace improved in-house operations, such as energy efficiency or conscience employment, such sponsorships do supplement CSR while enhancing the budgets and programs of the chosen NGO partner. Nature Valley’s significant work with the National Parks Project provides a top-rate example. Over $360,000 has been donated to the National Parks Conservation Association to date.
2. Strategic Partnerships: The advance of CSR has also no doubt fueled the emergence and expansion of more long-term, strategic for-profit and nonprofit associations. These efforts, often requiring extensive Memorandums of Understanding, years of development and significant financial commitments, go well beyond the scope of donations and marketing. Noteworthy examples include Conservation International & Starbucks as well as Environmental Defense Fund & McDonald’s. These ongoing and far-reaching efforts bridge divides and touch on everything from supply chains, climate, forest protection, waste mitigation and more. While some such partnerships are funded solely by the corporate partner and others share financial responsibilities, these cross-sector efforts enhance the reputation of both organizations while significantly advancing shared environmental goals.
3. Watchdogs still needed: While it is nice to think that CSR has limited the need for NGO and consumer watchdogs that simply is not the case. Even during transformational partnerships like those mentioned above, collaboration is an addition to, not a replacement for advocacy and accountability. Indeed, in times of conflict, nonprofit collaborators have publicly disagreed with corporate partners on strategies and goals, solidifying the importance of NGO actors to remain independent. And those are the partners! Regrettably there are many for-profit entities yet to embrace basic tenets of sustainability and continue to support practices with a single bottom line view. We continue to look to our nonprofit advocates to identify, publicize and, when necessary, call out these latecomers for the betterment of society.
Our shared ecological and societal imperatives are without boundary and therefore require cross sector involvement. Blurred lines are not only non-threatening, but are necessary to meet our urgent needs. Silos can no longer endure as success is the product of cooperation.