« Back to Home Page

Sign up for the 3p daily dispatch:

Nissan LEAF and Chevy Volt Target Different Drivers

Presidio Marketing | Monday November 14th, 2011 | 4 Comments


3p is proud to partner with the Presidio Graduate School’s Managerial Marketing course on a blogging series about “sustainable marketing.” This post is part of that series. To follow along, please click here.

By Crystal Arvigo

While both the Nissan LEAF and the Chevy Volt are leading players in the electric car arena, their marketing pitches are targeted at quite different audiences. I was curious to learn more about the cars both from a practical and functional perspective, and to get a feel for how two very different companies would go about marketing a seemingly similar product.

In reviewing the marketing collateral and ad campaigns for the LEAF and the Volt, I was immediately struck by the fact that the LEAF is clearly going after the early adopter/leading user market and plays much more strongly on potential customers’ sentiments about the environment to evoke a very strong sympathetic and emotional response.  The LEAF has some functional drawbacks as compared to the Volt, such as not having gasoline as a substitute in between charges if needed. Nissan’s messaging appears to embrace this distinction with pride by suggesting the car is on the absolute cutting edge of the new electric vehicle technology.

The Volt on the other hand, clearly plays up the idea that the Volt is just a small change for the typical American car consumer, and that it is not in fact disrupting our driving habits too greatly.  Their campaign tagline says it all: “More car than electric.” GM has clearly opted to skip the early adopters and leading users altogether and move right on to the early majority, mainstream car enthusiasts.  The Volt’s advertising is designed to evoke a feeling of slow and steady progression both in history and in technology to arrive at the Volt today.  The commercial shows quick time shots of cars over the last century or so and then moves to recent history highlighting GM’s small and fuel efficient cars, to GM’s hybrid SUV’s and finally arrives at the Volt.  Clearly, the messaging is designed to build on history and legacy to give the mainstream consumer the warm and fuzzy feeling of incremental change. The ability to use both gas and electric power consoles the mainstream user with a feeling of safety and comfort in “the way I’ve always done it.”

Interestingly, the Volt advertising uses almost no emotional piquing with regard to environmental issues, while the LEAF advertising seeks an almost visceral response from its emotional and environmentally charged ads about the polar bear and the value of ZERO emissions, pollution, and dependence of foreign oil.  The other angle highlighted in LEAF advertising is a challenge to the status quo.  This line of thinking targets the early adopter who avidly embraces change, versus the early majority who like things to stay more or less the way they are.  Nissan questions our assumptions rather brilliantly by showing all the common machines we have come to know as using electric power and asks, “what if everything ran on gas…then again, what if everything didn’t?” Nissan shouts, “This car will change your life!” and GM says, “This car won’t really change the way you live your life.”  Both messages are considered positive when delivered to the appropriate audience, but would either bore or terrify the wrong set of ears.

Which messaging appeals to you more? Do you find the advertising effective? Does the advertising change your perception of the cars?

Crystal Arvigo is a graduate student at Presidio Graduate School, a Sustainable Management MBA program based in San Francisco, CA.

image credits: Chevrolet, Nissan


▼▼▼      4 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup
  • gotmyleaf

    I enjoyed reading this piece! I own a Nissan LEAF and I am definately one who “avidly embraces change.” I’m not into the Polar Bear. The Chevy Volt ads do bore me, but I was prepared to buy one if no 100% battery cars were available. The Nissan test drive event is what really got me to buy.

  • http://jpwhitenissanleaf.com JPWhite

    I agree the cars are aimed at different potential buyers. GM agrees that also, they have announced the Spark 100% electric as a sequel to the Volt, and is consistent in their portrayal of progressive advancements.

    I considered both the Volt and LEAF when deciding which EV to purchase. The LEAF won me over due to the fact it does make financial sense to own one, whereas the Volt is a little too expensive to pay back in savings the extra purchase price.

    Like the other commentors, the LEAF test drive is what sealed the deal for me.

    To sumarize my buying decision.

    1. Cost Effective
    2. Appeals to the inner geek
    3. Fun to Drive
    4. Divert my money away from imported oil and those who wish us harm.

    Environmental concerns were not a factor for me.

    http://wp.me/p1sK3k-i

  • @bobbleheadguru

    The premise of this piece is interesting. However, I would challenge the writer of the piece to review actual Volt commercials v. the commercial that was referred to which is actually a Chevy brand commercial.

    Please review the Volt commercials which include the two gas station commercials, the drive through commercial and the parking lot commercial.

    Not sure if your opinion will change, but you might as well evaluate the commercials that GM intended those that are considering Volts to watch.

    http://bobbleheadguru.com

  • Hal

    I own a Leaf. I was not interested in an electric car until I test drove a Leaf in December 2010. Loved it. Everyday is a learning activity. The range anxiety is gone. It is definitely designed for people who are comfortable with change.