« Back to Home Page

Sign up for the 3p daily dispatch:

Solar Photovoltaics: Pros and Cons

RP Siegel | Thursday April 5th, 2012 | 8 Comments

There is no perfect energy source. Each and every one has its own advantages and compromises. This series will explore the pros and cons of various energy sources.  Learn about other forms of energy generation here.

Solar PV is perhaps what most people think of first when they think of renewables (though we actually use more biomass). Solar PV can be used anywhere the sun shines as long as there is space available. Enough sunlight falls on the Earth in one hour, to meet the world’s energy demand for a year, if it could be collected. It is eminently scalable with installations ranging from a few kilowatts to the 48 megawatt Copper Mountain solar farm in Nevada. Utility scale solar capacity is quite small compared to the big boys, like the 8200 MW Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant in Japan or the 5780 MW Taichung coal plant in China.

Solar presently contributes a very small share of our energy pie, around 1 percent, but it continues to grow at double-digit rates and is projected to triple from 2010-15 after growing almost ten-fold from 2003-2010.

It is also the subject of a great deal of research, so we should expect a number of breakthroughs coming down the pike, including things like nano-pillars to lower cost, concentrators to reduce the area required, and more efficient and powerful cells, to reduce both. Most solar PV systems today are either made from traditional silicon-based solar cells, or the newer thin-film technology.

Solar PV systems produce DC current, which can be used with DC appliances or converted to AC by means of an inverter. More and more of today’s electronics run on DC, which requires those little power supplies that plug into the wall which convert the AC to DC. This could be an opportunity in the future to power these devices directly from solar PV, eliminating the efficiency losses that occur when converting from DC to AC and then back again.

Let’s take a look at the solar PV pros and cons.


  • Clean energy. No combustion. No greenhouse gas emission from use.
  • Inexhaustible and abundant “fuel” supply
  • Available nearly everywhere
  • Well suited for distribution generation
  • Technology exists today and is rapidly improving
  • Generates electricity directly from sunlight
  • No moving parts required
  • Power generation is silent. No noise or pollution.
  • Little or no transmission required
  • Matches up well with air-conditioning need
  • Require minimal maintenance
  • Grants and incentives are sometimes available
  • Excess heat can be used for co-generation


  • Intermittent source. Not available at night or under clouds.
  • Relatively high cost, especially with storage
  • Requires inverter to produce AC current
  • Requires storage or grid connection for continuous round-the-clock use
  • Less available for heating demand (time of day and season)
  • Exotic materials required in many thin-film systems
  • Requires a relatively large amount of open space
  • Relatively low efficiency (around 17-40 percent)
  • Relatively low energy intensity ( ~8-12 m2/ kW)
  • Fragile materials
  • Possible aesthetic issues
  • Technology risk: a much better system might come out next year

Besides the relatively clear cut pros and cons of solar PV, there are also the transformative socio-economic impacts of moving from centralized to distributed power generation. There is clearly a technical advantage, since efficiency losses associated with long range transmission are eliminated, as are, possibly hundreds of miles of power lines that now crisscross the landscape. Lost would be certain economies of scale and centralized control. Distributed power generation is more resilient against large-scale blackouts as well as acts of terror, though it could mean a change in business models for today’s utilities. This is a trend that has been predicted by Jeremy Rifkin in his Third Industrial Revolution. After all, who wouldn’t want a house that produces its own power, rather than a house that is just a house?
To summarize:


What about other energy sources?

[Image credit: eastpole: Flickr Creative Commons]

RP Siegel, PE, is the President of Rain Mountain LLC. He is also the co-author of the eco-thriller Vapor Trails, the first in a series covering the human side of various sustainability issues including energy, food, and water. Now available on Kindle.

Follow RP Siegel on Twitter.


Newsletter Signup
  • TedKidd

    My rental property has a perfect south face, 12/12 pitch, recently re-roofed.  

    I’d love to figure out how my tenants could lease solar panels for that house. 

  • http://twitter.com/SolarUniverseCA Solar Universe SoCal

    I read that there is a new technology currently under R&D.  They have invented a solar tower that is amazing incredible and creates more renewal energy than the flat solar panels.
    Mary J.

  • http://www.solio-blog.com/ Linda

    Thanks for listing the pros and cons of solar panels, really interesting to me.

  • eastpole

    Bob, you say solar “Matches up well with air-conditioning need.” This is such a valuable concept.

    Where I live in Ontario, Canada, we have ~300 MW of solar capacity but we use 3000 MW extra electricity on a sunny summer day. It seems to me that people who argue that solar doesn’t power anything at night or under clouds (certainly true) should hold off on that argument until we have offset our air conditioning load — and we’re only 10% of the way there.

    I’m pleased that you like my close-up photo of a solar panel; this is part of one of our many solar-powered parking meters in Toronto. I’m told they add up to about 20 kW of capacity spread across the city.

  • Martin Kral

    I am a huge advocate for nuclear for base load power and solar PV as supplemental. I just built a new house in New Mexico with passive solar for heating and PV for my air conditioning (only 3 summer months) and all other electrical appliances throughout the year. When I do need base load electricity follow-up from the utility company, I would like that to be as cheap as possible and I believe that thorium energy with LFTR technology is that solution.
    I am concerned about PV’s future. There have been many commerical failures and this has got to be resolved with technology soon before people give up on them too.

  • Tyler Strand

    One potential problem I see with solar is the ability to obtain the elements necessary to build such systems, such as silicon. Silicon is being used more and more today for our electronic systems, so what happens when we start to run out of these resources? I think it is best to hold off on mass producing solar panels until we are sure that efficiency and energy storage are vastly improved. We must make sure not to make the same mistakes that we did with oil, which will most likely be depleted by 2100.

  • Tyler Strand

    Also, consider susceptibility to solar storms. These events would decimate these systems.

  • dojo

    great facfs