« Back to Home Page

Geothermal Energy: Pros and Cons

RP Siegel | Friday June 15th, 2012 | 13 Comments

There is no perfect energy source. Each and every one has its own advantages and compromises. This series will explore the pros and cons of various energy sources.  Learn about other forms of energy generation here.

The core of the Earth, some 4,000 miles beneath its surface, is a fiery morass of superheated gas and molten rock which exists at roughly 7200 degrees Fahrenheit. That temperature is maintained by the decay of radioactive particles located within the Earth’s core. Technically, one could say that geothermal power is a form of nuclear power, though with far different implications from nuclear power as we know it, since these reactions occur in a containment vessel with walls thousands of miles thick. Even so, we still get things like uranium and radon gas, seeping up to the surface.

Moving away from the core, the temperature cools down to the point where it might be 1500 degrees, fifty miles down and 3-400 degrees, three to four miles below the surface. Since the Earth is not at all uniform, these results will vary. There will be some places where the crust is thinner than others, which means the hotter temperatures will be closer to the surface. Hot springs, geysers and, of course, volcanoes can often be found in these places. The Earth’s crust varies from roughly 20 to 40 miles thick as measured from the surface. (It is thinner beneath the sea.)

The amount of thermal energy contained in the Earth’s crust is enormous. Experts estimate it at an equivalent of 79 million billion barrels of oil, or roughly 15,000 times more than estimated worldwide oil reserves. And unlike oil, much of that heat is continually replenished. The hydrothermal resource base (found in hot springs, etc.) has been estimated at 100,000 MW or more.

Geothermal resources vary from location to location, but as new technologies emerge that are capable of utilizing lower temperatures, geothermal power will become more widespread. Iceland, already generates more than 25 percent of its energy from geothermal.

A major new project was recently announced in Kenya.

So how do you produce electricity from this abundant source? It actually almost as simple as drilling a hole in the ground, sending water down, having steam come up and running that steam through a turbine. There are of course many nuances. You can see a nice presentation here.

Geothermal power, like solar thermal power, can also be harnessed for low intensity heat at shallower depths, which can be used for space and water heating and cooling.

So what are some of the pros and cons?

Pros

  • Almost entirely emission free
  • Zero carbon
  • The process can scrub out sulfur that might have otherwise been released
  • No fuel required (no mining or transportation)
  • Not subject to the same fluctuations as solar or wind
  • Smallest land footprint of any major power source
  • Virtually limitless supply
  • Inherently simple and reliable
  • Can provide base load or peak power
  • Already cost competitive in some areas
  • Could be built underground
  • Some level of geothermal energy available most places
  • New technologies show promise to utilize lower temperatures

Cons

  • Prime sites are very location-specific
  • Prime sites are often far from population centers
  • Losses due to long distance transmission of electricity
  • Water usage
  • Sulfur dioxide and silica emissions
  • High construction costs
  • Drilling into heated rock is very difficult
  • Minimum temperature of 350F+  generally required
  • Care must be taken to manage heat and not overuse it

All in all, this is a very positive balance. There is certainly a lot of potential here and one would expect to see a growing number of systems emerging around the world in places where the resource is abundant.

***

What about other energy sources?

[Image credit: Eyeline-imagery: Flickr Creative Commons]

RP Siegel, PE, is the President of Rain Mountain LLC. He is also the co-author of the eco-thriller Vapor Trails, the first in a series covering the human side of various sustainability issues including energy, food, and water in an exciting and entertaining format. Now available on Kindle.

Follow RP Siegel on Twitter.


▼▼▼      13 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup
  • me

    is a very good page

    • jo

      same

  • uh is it non-renewable or renewable i have to get a page of them done and i already started a long time ago BUT FORGOT JUMPDRIVE stupid me

    • nicole_nicole

      it is renewable

      • AllanGonzalezTheScienceGuy

        It shouldn’t be even considered renewable because it replenishes faster than the actual demand

  • TheBigCheeseish

    Very Helpful

  • Tom Nicholson

    Geo-Thermal plants are already in operation in New Zealand, Iceland and Guadaloupe Caribbean Island. The potential is being missed in the U.S.A. Are oil, fossil fuel interests helping to keep America out of this field of energy development?

    • AllanGonzalezTheScienceGuy

      No the reason for that is that a geothermal energy is best used in places that have more tectonic activity and a lot is in Greenland and other places.

  • ricky j

    this is helping me out on my essay for school thanks :]

  • NHSNH

    A PRO ABOUT GEOTHERMAL ENERGY IS THAT IS NOT REQIIRED TO PRODUCE

  • drizzy

    I love eating turkey bakin and winning @ cod against fruitcake xbox live players

  • Abraham

    good one

  • Kyrel Jerome

    Very useful for my project, thank you.