« Back to Home Page

Aramark and Humane Society Move to Eliminate Gestation Crates

| Monday August 27th, 2012 | 4 Comments

Add another to the list! After several companies, such as Oscar Mayer, Wendy’s, Sysco, McDonald’s, and Costco to name a few, made calls for significant pork production changes, we now have another company demanding the removal of gestation crates from their pork production supply chains. ARAMARK, in conjunction with the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), announced on August 21st its plans to eliminate all pork from animals bred using gestation crates in its U.S. supply chain. The food service company has asked its primary pork suppliers to develop plans for reducing, and then eliminating, gestation crates by 2017. New contracts with these contingencies and goals are to be in place as soon as possible.

Most breeding pigs in the U.S. are confined in gestation crates 24 hours a day, for years, for virtually their entire lives. The cages, comprised of metal bars and concrete flooring, are approximately two feet wide and prohibit the animals from even turning around, and essentially immobilize them during never-ending four-month cycles of impregnation.

And, it is not just animal rights activists who cite these conditions as unacceptable. Many farmers, animal scientists, consumers, and companies in the food service industry are working to phase out gestation crates and provide more humane breeding environments. The Humane Society distinguishes the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production, funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts and Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, and which included the former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, who together recommended that “all systems that restrict natural movement,” including gestation crates, be phased out.

The Humane Society also explains that pork supplier concerns about economic difficulties due to eliminating gestation crates are, in the long term, unfounded. According to HSUS, a 2007 Iowa State University-conducted two-and-a-half year long economic comparison of gestation crates and group housing found that “reproductive performance can be maintained or enhanced in well-managed group housing systems…without increasing labor.” The study concluded that, overall, “group housing…resulted in a weaned pig cost that was 11 percent less than the cost of a weaned pig from the individual stall confinement system.”

It is no surprise, then, that “ARAMARK is proud to stand in partnership with other industry leaders and supply chain partners to transition away from gestation crates in a timely fashion,” said Kathy Cacciola, ARAMARK’s Senior Director of Environmental Sustainability. “We’re committed to operating responsibly and addressing key issues, including animal welfare, throughout our supply chain and business, and this commitment helps move the entire industry toward the elimination of gestation crates.”

“ARAMARK is the largest U.S.-based food service company taking a stand on this issue and the company’s decision to eliminate pork from methods using gestation crates is a move toward even greater social responsibility,” said Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of the Humane Society of the United States. “ARAMARK has been a great partner to work with, and we applaud its decision to develop a proactive transition plan to 2017.”

Though not all companies approached with this cause decide to take action (shareholders of Domino’s Pizza, the world’s second largest pizza chain, shot down a recent proposal regarding their supply chain’s use of gestation crates), the fact that so many, so quickly, are joining together in the cause of ethical animal treatment can only be viewed as a victory. And for those companies lagging behind, it appears to be only a matter of time.

You can view the Humane Society’s informational video on gestation crates here.

Photo courtesy of Wikipedia.


▼▼▼      4 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup

Comments

  1. August 27, 2012 at 12:41 pm PDT | Reggie Richmond writes:

    This is really great news. Congrats to The Humane Society for all its recent work on this issue. So many big companies are on board it’s surprising that there are any hold outs at this point. This will truly mean a much better life for many animals!

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  2. August 27, 2012 at 12:51 pm PDT | Josh writes:

    Congrats to ARAMARK for taking a stand against this type of cruelty to animals. Mother pigs shouldn’t be confined in a cage so small they can’t ever turn around.

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  3. August 27, 2012 at 13:08 pm PDT | Kenny Torrella writes:

    Thank you, ARAMARKand The Humane Society! This is great news for the millions of mother sows languishing in gestation crates, and it demonstrates ARAMARK’s commitment to improving social responsibility.

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

  4. November 21, 2012 at 22:22 pm PDT | kayla writes:

    yea thanks! Your efforts will go far in not only getting these animals treated humanely, but towards us, so that we may eat spiritually clean food. However, I don’t think it should take 5 years. Boom get rid of the crates, have the government subsidize the animal farmers in that one year. Done 1.5 years!

    Reply Or REGISTER HERE if you are new.

Leave a Reply

  1. Please leave an intelligent comment. You are welcomed to link to your company or website, but entirely self promotional posts will be marked as spam.
There are 3 ways to comment on 3P

2. Facebook Users

Login to your Facebook account

3. Members

Register for an account or login.

Subscribe to Comments