« Back to Home Page

Fast Fashion Has to Slow Down

3p Contributor | Tuesday July 23rd, 2013 | 4 Comments

Fast FashionBy Gia Machlin

A few years ago, those checking labels for chemical ingredients in their food, buying organic produce, or looking at the sustainability ratings of seafood were in the vast minority. Organic and natural foods were only available in “health food” and specialty stores and organic restaurants were practically unheard of. People were also buying their clothing at Target, H&M, Gap, and from designers without thinking about where and how it was manufactured. And while the food industry has undergone a slow but steady revolution, fast fashion has yet to slow down.

Thanks to slow food pioneers like Michael Pollen, Michelle Obama and Jamie Oliver, there’s been a wave of change around food. We’ve seen organic food sections of supermarkets and restaurants specializing in sustainable cuisine pop up everywhere, and we’ve even seen more sustainable choices in our children’s school food programs. But, for the most part, we still buy our clothing without thinking about the workers and the materials behind their production. Unfortunately, until the tragic collapse of a factory killed over 1000 women workers in Bangladesh this past April, few people were tuned in to the sustainability issues around fashion. That is beginning to change. I can only hope this is the start of a fashion revolution.
When thinking about the “sustainability” of any product, in this case clothing, it is helpful to consider three important elements:
1) The effect on the earth, nature and the environment

2) The personal health and safety impact on the consumer

3) The impact on the workers who make the product

The environmental component is probably the most well-known aspect of the three elements I listed above. What materials were used in making the product? How much water and energy were consumed during the production process? How many miles did the product have to travel to get to the consumer? Is the product reusable, recyclable, or compostable, or does it leave behind a large footprint upon disposal? These are all critically important questions to be asking, and luckily we have reputable eco-labels and life cycle analysis experts to guide us through the decision making process. But how much have you heard about the personal health impact of a cotton t-shirt or dress?

According to the Organic Trade Association, “Cotton is considered the world’s ‘dirtiest’ crop due to its heavy use of insecticides, the most hazardous pesticide to human and animal health. Cotton covers 2.5 percent of the world’s cultivated land yet uses 16 percent of the world’s insecticides, more than any other single major crop.” Really? And I put that shirt on my child? They go on to say that “during the conversion of cotton into conventional clothing, many hazardous materials are used and added to the product, including silicone waxes, harsh petroleum scours, softeners, heavy metals, flame and soil retardants, ammonia, and formaldehyde – just to name a few.” Wow! That should make you think twice next time you shop for camp clothing for your kids. Luckily there are companies that use GOTS-certified organic cotton and other non-toxic materials in their clothing. We sell many of those organic cotton clothing products at EcoPlum. And many manufacturers are starting to shift to less toxic production processes, which is great for those of us who don’t want to leach chemicals into our skin just from wearing clothing. But the part that, until this year, got the least attention was the third aspect of sustainability: how are the workers who made the article of clothing treated?

After the tragedy at the Rana Plaza factory in Bangladesh, H&M and other European companies signed the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, but U.S. companies refused to sign it. Then, on July 10th, over two months after the tragedy, 17 major U.S. retailers, including Walmart, Gap, Target and Macy’s, announced their plan to improve factory safety in Bangladesh: The Bangladesh Worker Safety Initiative. Unlike the European agreement, which is legally binding, this initiative does not hold companies legally responsible for the major features of the five-year plan: funding safety upgrades, holding inspections and providing employees with a hotline to report complaints. Still, this is a step in the right direction. But as long as there are workers in developing countries making our clothing, it is important that we find out more about the conditions of those workers before making a purchase. One good way is to purchase clothing from companies that are members of the Fair Trade Federation, Green America Certified, Fair Trade USA Certified or otherwise transparent about the fair treatment of the people who make their products.

This is a lot to think about when making a clothing purchase, but if we make these mindful decisions and evolve as consumers, the fashion industry will have to follow suit.

Gia is the President and CEO of EcoPlum. an environmentally focused digital magazine and online boutique, specializing in stylish and unique eco friendly products and original articles on green living and environmental action. Under its loyalty program, customers earn green shopping rewards points, called EcoChipz, good for coupons in its shop or donations to environmental causes.


▼▼▼      4 Comments     ▼▼▼

Categorized: Eco Products, Supply Chain|

Newsletter Signup
  • Austin Kaiser

    So is wearing non-organic cotton harmful to your health? What are the actual ill-effects?

  • Gia

    Hi Austin. There has not been adequate testing to determine whether
    fabric
    additives, such as insecticides and metals, can safely be in constant
    contact with human skin, according to the authors of “Killer Clothes.”
    However, there have been many studies showing the correlation between
    pesticide exposure and cancer and neurological diseases. This is from
    WikiPedia: “A 2007 systematic review found that “most studies on non-Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia showed positive associations with pesticide exposure” and thus concluded that cosmetic use of pesticides should be decreased.[2] Strong evidence also exists for other negative outcomes from pesticide exposure including neurological, birth defects, fetal death,[3] and neurodevelopmental disorder.[4]
    ” Also, see what I wrote above regarding what the Organic Trade
    Association says about additives to conventional cotton. Seems it would
    be better to err on the safe side and avoid non-organic cotton
    clothing.

  • Katie Schmidt

    Great article! I agree! I recently started a women’s fair trade clothing line called Passion Lilie. We work with woman to give them a dignified job with fair wages and good working conditions. Check it out: passionlilie.com

  • Gia

    FYI – I will be appearing on Green is Good Radio on Saturday to discuss these issues a little more. Please tune in! http://www.prweb.com/releases/EcoPlum_Fair_Trade/Green_is_Good_Radio/prweb10982580.htm THANKS!