How George Clooney Could Help Nespresso Solve Its Coffee Pod Problem

George Clooney helps Nespresso solve pod problemGeorge Clooney has become a familiar face in the world of coffee thanks to his association with the upscale coffee company Nespresso, and now it appears that the actor is poised to help Nespresso address a daunting set of sustainability issues. The problem is that Nespresso has been trying to establish itself as a green brand, but its whole business platform rests on the latest symbol of wasteful packaging: the disposable single-serving coffee pod.

Nespresso is, of course, encouraging its customers to recycle the pods, and while that would appear to be a logical message for Clooney to help pitch, the company has set its sights on a more comprehensive message. Clooney, who has a history of environmental activism under his belt, is no longer mere window dressing for Nespresso’s ad campaigns, he is now a member of the company’s newly formed Sustainability Advisory Board, which will help steer the company’s “AAA Sustainable Quality™ Program.”

A comprehensive approach to sustainability

Nespresso’s stepped-up relationship with Clooney provides a good illustration of how companies that sell problematic goods and services can still make significant progress on sustainability issues overall, even if they don’t directly address the object of controversy (which in this case, is the coffee pods).

In fact, Nespresso’s website avoids the entire pod life cycle issue, including the recycling message. The site’s recycling page sports only a brief reminder that customers can bring the pods back to Nespresso or Sur la Table locations before moving briskly along to note that the pods are made of aluminum in order to preserve flavor.

In contrast, the AAA Sustainable Quality Program receives a lavish amount of attention from Nespresso. The program started ten years ago in partnership with the Rainforest Alliance and other stakeholders, with the aim of promoting sustainable coffee growing and, by association, sustainable communities (for a similar approach, take a look at the vision recently expressed by Levi Strauss CEO and President John Anderson).

According to Nespresso (which, by the way, is a unit of Nestlé), a recent study by the Colombian research institute CRECE indicates that the program is working, with AAA-participating farms demonstrating “significantly higher levels of environmental, economic and social performance.”

George Clooney and the Sustainability Advisory Board

The formation of the Sustainability Advisory Board comes at a critical time for AAA, as Nespresso plans to expand the program in Ethiopia and Kenya, and re-establish coffee growing in South Sudan. The initiative includes partnerships with local governments and the nonprofit organization TechnoServe, as well as community development programs.

Building on its success with AAA in Latin America, Nespresso also plans to expand AAA to serve more “smallholder” farms in Ethiopia and Kenya, with the goal of doubling the supply of coffee from the region by 2020. According to Nespresso, it currently has 56,000 farms enrolled in the program and receives about 80 percent of its coffee from those farms.

Clooney’s role is expected to focus on the South Sudan project with TechnoServe. The organization has a solid track record in local agricultural development, including coffee farming.

As for Mr. Clooney’s track record, so far he hasn’t been on our radar but now is a good time to catch up. Back in 2006, the actor appeared in a splashy green-themed cover for Vanity Fair to help promote the oil-themed film Syriana, noting in an interview that “If you’re doing a movie about oil consumption and corruption, you can’t just talk the talk. You gotta walk the walk.”

The “walk” for Syriana included a partnership with the Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council that launched the Oil Change campaign. In a symbolic tie-in, Clooney became an early EV adopter with the purchase of  an all-electric Tango, later upgrading to a Tesla Roadster EV.

Interestingly, in a 2011 profile Clooney noted a conflict between his environmental concerns and his use of private jets. That may soon become a moot point as renewable jet biofuel comes into widespread use, but it does echo the dilemma that companies like Nespresso and, for that matter, Green Mountain find themselves in.

As with private jet travel, when you look at the coffee pod issue in isolation what you see is a wasteful practice.

Clooney has created a bigger picture by engaging in environmental issues as well as numerous humanitarian and human rights endeavors. Similarly, Nespresso is working to achieve a counterbalance to the pod issue, and its sustainable farming initiatives arguably accomplish that.

[Image (cropped): Nespresso ad via flickr.com by culture.culte]

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.

Tina is a career public information specialist and former Deputy Director of Public Affairs of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, and author of books and articles on recycling and other conservation themes. She writes frequently on sustainable tech issues for Triple Pundit and other websites, with a focus on military, government and corporate sustainability, and she is currently Deputy Director of Public Information for the County of Union, New Jersey.

One response

  1. George Clooney has no right to claim any green credentials, he is a rich man who uses his wealth to burn enormous quantities of fossil fuels in the worst possible environment; for his simple comfort in a private jet, rather than travelling with others and allow savings of economy of scale at the very least.

    As for changing to bio-fuel, or perhaps greener, hydrogen, this wouldn’t exonerate him either, bio-fuels are destroying the environment already, are barely economical and certainly are an ecological and social disaster displacing the poorest people and destroying pristine virgin environments – or are we so blind that we can ignore the horrific consequences of bio-fuels so long as we can get tax credits?

    As to why such a rich, successful person would need to “whore” his fame for a few dollars from a company who uses, what are in practice, –DISPOSABLE– coffee “pods” when it is far more ecological to grind coffee on site (not to mention cheaper)

    If your local barrister cannot make coffee to the same or higher standard than “Nespresso” (the name should give away how stupid Nestle thinks it’s customers are), then perhaps you should shop at real coffee shop, one whose employees can make coffee, not underpaid coffee pod automatons.

    Isn’t it better to pay real wages for real Barristers with coffee making skills? GK would rather you pay the huge shareholder profits while using of enormous quantities of Oil resources required to make disposable packaging, distribute this inflated, over-packaged product, before having to dispose of this useless consumer waste! All this while ensuring that the social cost is that you create nothing more than Mac-jobs, further increasing the rich-poor divide and turning a human being into nothing more than a mindless servile skill-less robot.

    Maybe we all need one of these fashionable plastic towers in our houses? After all lots of coffee is great for the health, isn’t it? and I’m sure all these machines won’t end up in landfill or storage space in less than a decade! ;-}

    I would bring up the baby deaths from the alleged Nestle marketing of milk to new mothers in developing countries, the resultant deaths, financial cost to worlds poorest mothers and the very real FACT that that such milk is a very poor, read A VERY BAD substitute for breast milk. It takes a real kind of EVIL Company to commercialize an unnecessary and damaging product for use on babies in the third world.

    But GK is good looking so I don’t think we should be too hard on him, after all I’m sure he has a good reason for needing the “blood and oil” money he’s getting from Nestle and can’t cut ties because I’m quite sure he’s going to use the money to save ecosystems, animals, and human lives elsewhere because how else could such a man live with his conscience?

Comments are closed.