« Back to Home Page

The Weather Company Confronts Climate Change Denial Head On

| Monday July 15th, 2013 | 5 Comments

weather company puts climate change denial issue to restRecently, some of the top business journalists in the U.S. went on record asserting that climate change denial is a form of political posturing that is not worthy of discussion in serious reporting on economic issues. If that doesn’t lay the whole climate change denial thing to rest, then hopefully this will: The Weather Company has just endorsed the BICEP (Business for Innovative Climate and Energy Policy) Climate Declaration, which acknowledges the scientific consensus on climate change.

As the owner of The Weather Channel and related weather media platforms, The Weather Company already reaches a broad audience with reality-based information, so it’s in a good position to help bridge the political divide…or is it?

Communicating about climate science

Let’s start with the current state of affairs, which is the information gulf separating climate scientists and the lay public. Politics aside, a large part of the problem has to do with the nature of communicating accurately about science in general. In many cases, it is impossible to reduce science into sound bites that can be absorbed during the course of daily life, especially in competition with the flood of other news in a media-saturated world.

Climate change poses an especially great communications challenge, because the hard evidence accumulates over long periods of time and cannot be seen with the naked eye, except in abstract form of a chart or graph.

The Weather Company and climate change

Public awareness is beginning to reach into new territory, even without the help of The Weather Company. In the past couple of years, more of the general population has had the misfortune to experience phenomena linked to climate change, namely, more frequent and severe storms, droughts, floods, and wildfires. That also includes people who live in areas that have not experienced extreme destruction in a generation or more, and now find their normally “safe” environment undergoing new threats.

In that regard, The Weather Company could help build these individual experiences into a tipping point. To see why, let’s go back a few months ago, when artist and researcher Nickolay Lamm used data from the non-profit organization Climate Central to create a series of arresting before-and-after images of East Coast landmarks affected by sea level rise. He had this to say about the project, which he called “Sea Level Rise in Real Life:”

I’m surprised at the amount of people calling this a ‘liberal agenda.’ When I was making these illustrations, I based them off sea level rise maps from Climate Central, not someone’s wild imagination.

Now Lamm has added a West Coast version to the project, and The Weather Company has picked up on it. In a July 12 article on weather.com, The Weather Channel posted Lamm’s West Coast images and video along with links to the East Coast version and to Climate Central.

The article also referenced NOAA and National Geographic, so consider that through The Weather Company, reality-based information from Climate Central is now associated with some of the most trusted (and non-political) names in science information, all wrapped around a series of truly stunning, graphic images of what some of the most familiar icons in the U.S. landscape would look like under water.

Top U.S. businesses support national climate policy

The Weather Company won’t have to carry the climate science freight by itself, of course. BICEP and The Climate Declaration are projects of the sustainable business group Ceres, and the list of endorsees already includes more than 600 stakeholders including hundreds of small businesses and major companies like IKEA, Starbucks, Levi Strauss & C0., GM, and Mars, Inc., as well as scores of ski resorts.

Joining The Weather Company in this most recent round of new Climate Declaration endorsements are Akamai Technologies, AMD, Dignity Health, K2 Sports, Participant Media, the Saunders Hotel Group.

[Image (cropped screenshot): The Weather Channel by psd]

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.


▼▼▼      5 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup
  • Talli Nauman

    Seems to me The Weather Channel was mum on climate change until President Obama finally made statements that recognized its existence. Did other people notice a marked change in TWC’s attention to the issue following the administration’s acknowledgement?

  • 13brian

    I agree Talli. Also, the ‘climate change’ does seem to be happening- however, it is not different than it has been since we started recording data. Which means, the likelyhood that man has a direct effect on it is asinine. Those who would believe and worse those who champion are un-educated at best. Money grubbers at worst, if you are a scientist getting grants that rely on ‘changes’ and ‘results’, not much incentive to just record data and say oh, well nothing to be done.

    • http://www.triplepundit.com Nick Aster

      Sorry pal, the likelihood that man has a direct effect on climate is very much proven. If scientists were trying to get money then they would pretend to be *uncertain* .. not certain.

  • 13brian

    I agree Talli. Also, the ‘climate change’ does seem to be happening- however, it is not different than it has been since we started recording data. Which means, the likelyhood that man has a direct effect on it is asinine. Those who would believe and worse those who champion are un-educated at best. Money grubbers at worst, if you are a scientist getting grants that rely on ‘changes’ and ‘results’, not much incentive to just record data and say oh, well nothing to be done.

  • Akakimmi

    I was just disturbed by a sound byte on TWC online in regard to “Ten Million Sea Creatures Dead.” In pursuing this alarming title, I was incensed by the blatant contradiction the piece exhibited. Most disturbing was the commentator saying “and all because of carbon dioxide.” Yet the report said nothing at all about numbers of dead scallops (which was ultimately what the report was about) and clearly said that scientists had not discovered the cause of the rise of ph levels in British Columbia. What? Murky at best, dangerously skewed info at worst. Shame on TWC either way, and shame on any and all news sources that spin information. I am thoroughly disgusted.