« Back to Home Page

Houston’s One-Bin Recycling Program: Path to Zero Waste or Environmental Racism?

Alexis Petru
| Wednesday July 23rd, 2014 | 5 Comments

HoustonWhen you think of zero waste, you might picture towering compost heaps or overflowing recycling carts – but what about one bin for all of your household waste, from carrot peels and chicken bones to junk mail and soda bottles? That’s the idea behind Houston’s “One Bin for All” program, which aims to boost the city’s dismal recycling rate of 19 percent, which falls 15 percent below the average national recycling figure.

Public officials predict the initiative will help the city keep 75 percent of its trash from the landfill, but critics of the program, ranging from the Texas Campaign for the Environment to the NAACP, contend that it will actually prevent the city from achieving zero waste and smacks of environmental racism.

Billed as the “next evolution of recycling,” Houston’s “One Bin for All” campaign is not to be confused with the single-stream recycling programs popular in many American cities. Single-stream recycling allows customers to place all of their recyclables in one cart and garbage in a second cart (there is sometimes a third cart for green waste). The one-bin program, on the other hand, is exactly as its name suggests: All of a household’s or business’ trash, recyclables and compostables are tossed into one bin, with no sorting required.

After collection, the waste will be hauled to a yet-to-be-constructed local materials recovery facility, specially designed to sort recyclable and compostable materials from garbage. Paper, plastics and other recyclables will be reprocessed; the facility will convert non-recyclables to either compost or energy, according to the city.

Of course, the main benefit of Houston’s proposal is customer convenience: It’s easy for residents and businesses to simply throw all of their waste into one bin, and the city won’t have to spend time and money educating customers to separate their waste streams correctly. Furthermore, “One Bin for All” will not only bump up the volume of recyclables and compostables collected, but it will also reduce greenhouse gas emissions – due to fewer materials degrading in the landfill and emitting methane, and fewer garbage truck trips around the city to pick up fewer bins, the city says.

But not everyone is on board with Houston’s bright idea to reduce its waste. Environmental groups like the Texas Campaign for the Environment and Zero Waste Houston charge that mixing together trash, recyclables and compostables in one bin will result in contaminated recyclables, particularly paper and cardboard, that either can’t be marketed to recyclers or will fetch a much lower price in the marketplace. To be fair, however, this is the same criticism recyclers cast at single-stream recycling when it was first introduced, and recycling processors eventually adjusted to the dirtier, wetter paper and cardboard in the market.

The NAACP and Robert Bullard, founder of the environmental justice movement, are also criticizing the plan’s proposed materials recovery facility – likely to be sited in one of Houston’s African American or Latino neighborhoods – as an environmental justice issue. The facility will convert trash into energy – and not simply separate recyclables from garbage – so social justice advocates are concerned about the emissions generated during this process and how it will affect the community’s health.

With all this controversy surrounding “One Bin for All,” one question keeps coming up: Why didn’t Houston simply roll out a single-stream program citywide? Before 2013, less than half of the city’s households had recycling bins, according to Zero Waste Houston. The city intimates that single-stream recycling isn’t making enough of a dent in the waste stream in Houston or in cities across the nation, since America’s recycling rate has hovered around 30 percent for years.

It is encouraging to see a city try to take an innovative approach to a common environmental problem, but, based on the success – and laudable recycling rates – of cities like San Francisco and Austin, it seems like Houston may be trying to reinvent the wheel.

Image credit: Flickr/Horacio Maria

Passionate about both writing and sustainability, Alexis Petru is freelance journalist based in the San Francisco Bay Area whose work has appeared on Earth911, Huffington Post and Patch.com. Prior to working as a writer, she coordinated environmental programs for Bay Area cities and counties. Connect with Alexis on Twitter at @alexispetru


▼▼▼      5 Comments     ▼▼▼

Newsletter Signup
  • sean

    I live in Jacksonville, FL. The biggest problem with the recycling program here is that my recycling bin fills up 5x faster than the garbage bin, and is picked up only once every two weeks.

  • TCE

    I recommend folks read our full report here: http://zerowastehouston.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ItsSmartertoSeparate_TCEF_ZeroWasteHoustonReport_July20141.pdf “One Bins” just don’t work and are designed to be paired with incinerators, which create massive amounts of air pollution, are expensive and the wrong way to go to combat climate change.

  • http://www.triplepundit.com Nick Aster

    This seems like an odd idea… why create the opportunity for so much more contamination? If they can actually find a way to sort it efficiently, however, then that’s a big accomplishment!

  • Hausman F

    Racism? I agree that the siting of things like incinerators is often a problem for poor areas, that’s hardly the crux of this story. Inflammatory headline guys!

  • Rob Watson

    Now that the Houston One Bin for All bids are in, it’s time to stop
    conjecturing about incineration, old technology solutions and deal with facts.

    Our team, which is one of the bidders for the One Bin program, agrees with
    many, if not most, of the criticisms of “dirty MRFs” incineration,
    discriminatory siting.

    As the founder of the LEED system, I have supported “recycling”
    for nearly 3 decades. I also support Houston’s One Bin program.

    I’d like to introduce you to the EcoHub, one of the bidders for the Houston
    RFP. The EcoHub represents a new paradigm, one that only sees resources and not
    “garbage”. The EcoHub will employ 900 people and reduces the cost of
    handling city-hauled waste by 20%. It turns over 90% of discarded material into
    finished products to be sold back into the Houston market. The EcoHub site is
    an abandoned paper mill that will repurpose existing facilities and is located
    in a sparsely populated area with good transportation access.

    The MaxDiverter is to a dirty MRF as a Tesla is to a Hummer. The EcoHub’s
    core technology, the MaxDiverter, has a uniquely patented 58 different sorting,
    recovery and processing technologies, compared to 11 for a typical dirty MRF,
    such as the one used in Birmingham. It’s not surprising that facility is not
    doing as well as expected. The separation technology is designed only for
    conventional “recyclables” and the rest–including left-over
    toxics–goes into the digester in highly variable batches, exactly the wrong
    way to run an anaerobic digester effectively.

    Using physics–the density, dimension and optical properties of
    materials–the MaxDiverter minimizes worker exposure to the material stream.
    Worker areas are fully exhausted, conditioned and air filtered and we are
    installing day care, a fitness center.

    All of the EcoHub’s technology is world-class, proven with decades of
    experience and it is guaranteed and bonded to perform by the equipment
    manufacturers, the system integrator and the developer partner. We can produce
    between 20 and 35 different 95%-clean material streams, which are converted
    on-site to a variety of paper products–yes, we can and will recycle
    ‘contaminated’ paper–composite plastic building products and outdoor
    equipment, compost, biogas, renewable fuels and conventional plastic and metal
commodities.

    The EcoHub will be located on the site of the abandoned Champion paper
    factory, which was chosen in large part because it has no environmental justice
    issues and we wanted to embody the concept of recycling at all levels of the project.
    The site also has a permitted landfill on the premises, one of the stipulations

    I think that giving your
    readers a full picture of the potential of Houston’s One Bin program could be
    an eye-opener and an opportunity to see what a true approach to One Bin Zero
    Waste could look like.