Americans have displayed many emotions regarding the recent halt of government services, including anger. But The Atlantic may have put its finger on the mood of the American people during and after the shutdown: betrayal.
In her article, Molly Ball writes that “even before the recent government shutdown, congressional approval hovered around 10 percent, a minority thought the country was on the right track, and a ‘throw the bums out’ mentality was rampant.”
Railing against the “mess” in D.C. is a time-honored tradition for both parties. That’s pretty much business as usual, but the Republicans raised the ante to unprecedented levels by threatening and then using an extortive, hissy-fit strategy to shut down the government if they did not get their demands, mainly to defund Obamacare.
Dell’s ambitiously named 2020 Legacy of Good Plan is actually quite ambitious, and even more important, realistic and philosophically consistent as it attempts to forge a long-term culture of sustainability.
The computer and electronics maker calls it the “next step” in its Powering the Possible commitment and it outlines “our goals for the future of sustainability and corporate responsibility at Dell.” The 69-page plan, according to Dell, is a long-term and collaborative “framework designed to aggregate and accelerate the ways that Dell and its IT solutions help customers, Dell team members and communities make lasting contributions to the planet and society.”
Microsoft’s 2013 Citizenship Report describes an ambitious agenda that includes making its operations carbon neutral and using the “power of technology” to promote human rights.
The software giant’s fiscal year 2013 was pivotal on those points, as CEO Steven A. Ballmer writes in the report, because it took the “first big, bold steps” in its transformation to a devices and services company and in its citizenship work.
Some citizenship developments he mentioned:
Wasting 1.3 billion tons of food causes huge economic losses and a lot of needless hunger, but there are climate environmental issues deeply connected to food waste, according to a report from the U.N.’s Food and Agriculture Organization.
FAO’s Food Wastage Footprint: Impacts on Natural Resources is the first study to analyze the impacts of global food wastage from an environmental perspective, looking specifically at its consequences for the climate, water and land use, and biodiversity.
Maybe it’s time to get serious about the development of alternative jet fuels as a way to aid both the airline industry and the environment, or at least throw more barrels of money at it. That is the American way, isn’t it?
The Federal Aviation Administration last week selected a group of universities to run a new Air Transportation Center of Excellence (COE) for alternate jet fuels and the environment. The COE, with Washington State University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as the lead universities, will explore ways to meet the environmental and energy goals that make up a large part of the Next Generation Air Transportation System, known as NextGen. The FAA says NextGen is the “transformation of how airplanes traverse the sky,” affecting pilots, passengers, air controllers and the aircraft.
The government-university partnership supports President Obama’s plan to address climate change, said Anthony Foxx, secretary of transportation. “The Center of Excellence will tap talented universities to help us take environmentally friendly, alternative jet fuel technology to the next level,” he said. “Airlines and their customers will both benefit from their work developing cleaner fuel that supports the environment and continued aviation growth.”
Air Canada’s second CSR report focuses on four areas of sustainability: safety, the environment, the well-being of employees, and community involvement. There are points of progress and but the airline acknowledges that further progress is needed.
In brief, not bad for a second effort by Canada’s biggest airline.
Citizens of the World “improves upon the first edition in a number of ways, including the fact it is based on a materiality assessment developed from an extensive survey we undertook to identify the sustainability issues of most concern to our stakeholders,” notes Calin Rovinescu, the airline’s president and CEO.
The coal industry’s plan to move millions of tons of coal through Pacific Northwest (PNW) terminals to China and other Asian markets received a body blow when Washington regulators said environmental impact reviews must consider the worldwide impact of burning the export coal in China.
One of the major battles surrounding the various proposals has centered on the “scope” of the environmental review process.
That question was answered on July 31 when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Washington State Department of Ecology, and Whatcom County jointly announced the scope of their joint Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposed coal export terminal at Cherry Point, in northwest Washington State. If built, it would be the largest coal export terminal in North America, exporting up to 48 million metric tons of coal per year to Asia. The proponents of the terminal include Peabody Energy, SSA Marine, and Goldman Sachs.
There are good reasons that CH2M Hill is consistently ranked as the top U.S. environmental firm, but for those with long memories, the company’s innovative and ground-breaking involvement in the Rocky Flats nuclear waste site cleanup and closure is a great place to start.
The Rocky Flats Nuclear Production facility near Denver opened in 1952, but by 1992, when it was ordered closed by President George H.W. Bush, it was a disaster: one of the worst hazardous sites in the world. The Department of Energy estimated it would take 75 years and cost as much as $37 billion to close and clean up the contaminated 175-acre facility.
Various contractors had little success and by 1995, DOE acknowledged that a different tack was needed. Rather than continuing with the bureaucracy’s normal transaction-based project procedures, DOE sought a collaborative, innovative performance-based contract and governance structure that would drastically reduce the time and the cost of the cleanup/closure project.
Why is the hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, method of drilling for natural gas and oil seemingly exempt from unintended consequences such as soil, water and air pollution, water waste and earthquakes, among other really bad things?
No need to answer that, but here’s another alarming outcome of fracking that could hit close to home, especially if your home is in Bradford County, PA, where 93 percent of the acreage is under lease to a gas company.
Nearly 63,000 residents there live above the Marcellus Shale and the fracking phenomenon is creating a new world of murky uncertainties around home lending, refinancing and the real estate market in general.
When a company produces 150 tons of food waste every day that is either a huge problem or a great opportunity to innovate and produce energy.
Kroger’s food divisions, Ralphs and Food 4 Less, opted for the latter. Recently the food would get trucked to a distribution center in Compton, CA, where it was combined and sent to a composter 100 miles away. But now Kroger’s food waste, which was a cost in terms of lost revenue, disposal fees and emissions, is providing cheap, clean energy for the distribution center.
Ralphs and Food 4 Less installed an “anaerobic digestion” system designed by Feed Resource Recovery at the DC: it takes in the food and puts out biogas, providing power for the campus where the center is located. “Anything that can’t be sold or donated comes into the system,” said Kendra Doyel, a spokesperson for Ralphs and Food 4 Less, who was quoted in a GreenBiz article.
The fate of tar sands development could shift to a potentially precedent-setting legal battle in Utah.
A coalition of conservation groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity, the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and others, have filed a 253-page “request for agency action” urging the Utah Department of Air Quality to revoke its June 21 approval of a new oil refinery in Green River, Utah. The refinery is planned by the Calgary-based U.S. Tar Sands.
Assuming the agency refuses to revoke the permit, the next step would be legal action in various courts. The group’s challenge is based on UDAQ’s approval of the plant over several alleged violations of the Utah Air Conservation Act. The challenge was submitted to the Utah Department of Environmental Quality and will be heard by an administrative law judge, and potentially, the Utah Supreme Court.
In addition to condemning the UDAQ decision, the coalition contends that the introduction of oil shale mining and refining would adversely affect the region’s air quality along with the fragile Colorado River Basin Green River Formation ecosystem. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that between 353 billion and 1.146 trillion barrels of oil in the Green River Formation “have a high potential for development,” which is 2-7 times as much as Alberta’s 170 billion barrels targeted by the Keystone XL pipeline.
Richard Heinberg and the Post Carbon Institute are on a mission to debunk the benefits of the hydraulic fracturing method of gas and oil extraction, or fracking, which many contend outweigh its disadvantages.
In his latest book, SNAKE OIL: How Fracking’s False Promise of Plenty Imperils Our Future, Heinberg—journalist, author and senior fellow at the Post Carbon Institute—says the “false hype” surrounding shale gas and oil production “has hijacked America’s energy conversation.”
Heinberg says his research shows that “rather than offering the nation a century of cheap energy and economic prosperity, fracking may well present us with a short-term bubble that comes with exceedingly high economic and environmental costs.”
Heinberg continues, “Horizontal drilling and hydrofracturing (“fracking”) for oil and gas pose a danger not just to local water and air quality, but also to sound energy policy, and therefore to our collective ability to avert the greatest human-made economic and environmental catastrophe in history.”
Ed note: Mars CSO Barry Parkin recently participated in a Twitter chat hosted by 3p and CSRWire to talk about its approach to sustainability. If you missed it, you can read the summary here.
Mars, Incorporated is putting its CSR principles where its mouth is – through an aggressive five-pronged strategy to accomplish an ambitious agenda that’s based on quality, responsibility, mutuality, efficiency and freedom.
It’s probably a safe bet that unwrapping a Milky Way bar does not lead immediately to thoughts of a company’s commitment to freedom, for example, but that’s an essential element of the private, family-owned business’s mindset.
McDonald’s should just stick to slinging cheap burgers and fries and abstain from budget recommendations for its workers.
A story from ThinkProgress reports McDonald’s and Visa in have launched a website that purports to advise its low-wage workers — they average $8.25 per hour — with some handy tips on how to live, you guessed it, on $8.25 an hour. It’s called the Practical Money Skills Budget Journal, or as they explain, “a great first step toward taking control of your money.”
We know that corporate responsibility is ethically correct, but is the jury still out on CSR as the correct business move?
In his new book, Nature’s Fortune, Mark R. Tercek, president and CEO of The Nature Conservancy, makes a strong and impassioned case that business and environmental interests can and must align for everyone’s long-term benefit. And that includes the planet. New win-win alignments may be closer to reality than many might realize.
Tercek wrote the book, published by Basic Books, with the science writer and conservation biologist Jonathan Adams. His premise is that business and society can thrive by investing in nature through new alliances that “will enable us to conserve nature on a scale never before achieved.”
A new valuation of nature is needed, which Tercek calls natural capital or placing a value on nature as an asset. This is not a Pollyanna thought: He brings a plateful of credibility to that idea, because prior to joining TNC in 2008, he was a managing director and partner at Goldman Sachs. At Goldman he was named by then-CEO Henry M. Paulson to build and lead the firm’s first environmental efforts, not necessarily in the name of CSR, but from a “pure business standpoint.”