Special announcement from Presidio:
Please join us for a Sustainable MBA Open House on Thursday, January 18. Reception starts at 6pm, program at 6:30pm. Hear an inspiring faculty panel presentation, including Dr. Ron Nahser, Presidio Provost; and Hunter Lovins, Presidio MBA faculty member.
Learn about the Presidio MBA in Sustainable Management program integrating environmental and socially responsible values into every ourse. You’ll also meet students and graduates and get your questions answered during the 30-minute Q&A. With a Presidio MBA, you’ll gain the practical business skills you need to create a more sustainable world as well as further your career goals. Event
Fort Mason Center, Building A, Marina Room
Entrance is at the intersection of Marina Blvd. & Buchanan St.
RSVP by Tuesday, January 16: events@presidioMBA.org or (415) 561-6555
Special announcement from Presidio:
Click to continue reading »
This week I will be looking into the efficiency of my microwave oven. This is part of an ongoing series in AskPablo where I am trying to determine the most efficient means for heating water. I would like to thank some of my readers for submitting excellent questions this week and I look forward publishing my answers in the coming weeks.
Take this with whatever political grain of salt you want to come up with, but suffice it to say that the incoming Democratic congress is likely to produce significant changes in the US Government’s attitude towards handling climate change. The following data are from an environmental defense poll of Democratic caucus voters and chairs in Iowa:
# 72% of Democratic caucus-goers say they consider global warming to be extremely (32%) or very (39%) serious. Only 11% dismiss it as just somewhat (9%) or not at all serious (2%). Among Democratic county chairs and vice chairs, 77% think global warming is extremely (37%) or very (40%) serious.
# 69% of caucus-goers and 80% of count chairs/vice chairs say they would be more likely “to support a presidential candidate who made cutting carbon pollution and global warming a big issue in their campaign.”
# Voters either don’t know the likely candidates or where they stand on global warming. In no case are a majority of caucus-goers able to offer an excellent or good rating of likely Democratic candidates’ performance on addressing the issue of global warming (ranging from 42% excellent/good for John Edwards to 28% for Tom Vilsack to 6% for Chris Dodd).
Happy New Year! I hope you are all ready to make some New Year’s Resolutions for sustainability. Will it be resolving to ride your bike to the store more often? Will it be to eat locally-grown food more often? Will it be to offset your vehicle’s carbon emissions? Well, how about adding one more to your list: getting rid of phantom power…Click to continue reading »
I love top ten lists. Have a quick look at Warren Karlenzig’s top ten sustainability stories of 2006. It’s seen through the lens of what applies to local government and is the sort of thing that most people might overlook – despite the importance of their local governments. It’s a good quick read for your holiday week! Check it here.
In case you haven’t checked it out already, be sure to drop by TreeHugger and see the new design. If you know me personally, this is why I haven’t been seen by light of day in weeks. But it’s 95% done (ok, it’s a permanenet work in progress), but I have to say it looks pretty good!
PS – if you use digg, be sure to digg Graham’s post about the site. Link Here.
We introduced you to RecycleBank back in February, but there’s new coverage in a recent Forbes article that’s worth checking out. To sum up – RecycleBank is sheer genius in terms of capturing the idea of the win-win-win situation.
People get paid to recycle and are given rewards, not in cash, but it gift cards to various merchants such as Starbucks and Whole Foods. The RecycleBank company manages to make money by charging municipalities a small amount for the service, and the gift card giving companies look good because they’re encouraging the program. Oh, and the environment benefits too, so that’s a 4x winner.
According to the latest issue of ClearProfit, a clean energy Hedge fund has been launched: The ALMA Clean Energy Hedge Fund, managed by Bozkurt Aydinoglu.
If anyone doesn’t know what a hedge fund is, don’t worry, plenty of hedge fund managers probably don’t either these days. It’s sort of a generic and often inappropriate term for any semi-private investment vehicle. The
original hedge funds were called partnerships, and run by living legends like Warren Buffet and George Soros, who would often hedge different investments or futures market positions so that they would make money no
matter which way the overall market went, or sometimes they wouldn’t. Nowadays, Hedge funds might specialize in different sectors of the financial markets, like commodities, energy, currency exchange, bankruptcies,
spin-offs, and of course, Clean energy.
Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers are, however, have you heard of them? They’re a Silicon Valley venture capital firm who helped to bring us the likes of Google, Amazon and Netscape. Guess what they are into now? Clean Tech. They have put 200 million or more into the likes of solar, biofuels, biomass gasification, and energy storage. This is great for the industry, and great for the future of greener, cleaner life on earth. Venture Capital can work wonders for start-ups because VCs aren’t afraid to have their money disappear completely nine times out of ten. Why? Because they make an astounding financial return on the tenth company, take it public, sell a bunch of it to schmucks in the IPO market, buy a newer 200 foot yacht, and sail it around while looking for ten more candidates to start the cycle over again, all the while donating bundles to charity.Click to continue reading »
BMW has just released its new 7-series Hydrogen Powered Vehicle. This is landmark event by any accounts. They plan to build one hundred of them over the next year, and up to several thousand per year eventually.
Unfortunately, like its non-tailpipe emitting brethren in green, the electric cars, The New 7 series is limited in range, and can only go 125 miles on Hydrogen. That’s not quite far enough to make a tour with it between the handful of Hydrogen refueling stations in Europe. Never worry, this super sedan can change over to old faithful gasoline at the flick of a button on the dash, keep right on motoring for another 310 miles, and people can smell the emissions it makes right there at the tailpipe just like a 1980 318i.
NRDC’s OnEarth Magazing offers some practical insight into the idea of “Green Investing” outlining the basics and giving a good overview of some of the big players. The article is worth passing around. One thing they leave out, however, is the importance of instututional investors such as pension funds and endowments in SRI – individuals can make a difference, but massive long-term investors are the ones who can make monumental change, and weather the short term losses required to get there.
Getting endorsements by major companies is not as easy as one might think (though considerable easier thatn winning the Tour de France). What’s harder is managing ones relationships with these companies while managing to take an effective stance on corporate social responsibility. Lance Armstrong appears to be doing both. Forbes has the details on how Lance is managing his endorsement empire. From the article, he has this to say about CSR:
The federal government can’t do everything now. There’s too much distraction there. If not for generous people like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett–and their companies–the world be a harder place to live in. Look at what Howard Shultz did with Starbucks and how everyone there has health insurance. I was talking to him the other day, and he’s now trying to take that concept further and make sure everyone is insured. That’s his passion, and that’s the way he runs Starbucks. He and his company set out to make a difference, and they’re doing just that.
If weren’t a necessary part of good hygiene and if it didn’t feel so good on a cold, groggy morning, the concept of a shower would seem a bit absurd. We take cold water and heat it to around 100°F, then store it in a large tank until we need it. Then it travels through cold and often uninsulated pipes to the far end of the house where it drops down onto our bodies and slips right down the drain. Aside from carrying away dirt, skin cells, soap, and hair it also takes all that heat energy with it down into the sewer… This seems like a model of inefficiency and there must be a better way. Luckily, there are several options. Some can be implemented only in new construction or heavy remodels but some can be done by everyone. I am certainly not going to advocate taking a bucket sponge-bath and donning patchouli oil or waiting for an odor-exorcism when the good Lord returns, so let’s get down to the science and engineering!Click to continue reading »
Attention MBA Students, here’s a great competition to think about over the winter break: Carnegie Mellon’s McGinnis Venture Competion has added a “Sustainable Technology” track to their annual business plan competition. Particularily outstanding contenders will recieve travel grants to the awards ceremony in Pittsburgh. More details on this Sustainable Future PDF.
When I travel, I reluctantly throw away my recyclables as it is too much hassle to seek out a recycling bin. I guess I’m not alone: According to the WSJ “Airlines Feel Pressure as Pollution Fight Takes Off“, the airline industry throws away enough aluminum cans each year to build 58 Boeing 747s. To put that in perspective, since 1970, only 1469 747s have been built, and fewer than that are in service.
Never mind the plastic cups, glass, magazines, and all the fuel consumed. The airlines are actually improving somewhat – fuel efficiency is improving 2% per year. However, air travel has been growing at about 5% annually, for a net increase in waste.
To their credit, Airlines have been working on more important things for those of us who occasionally like to fly, like staying in business. And since the 70s, they have cut down on noise pollution, air pollution, and as
those who fly know, they don’t serve food anymore. Yes, we complained about the food, and now we complain about the absence of food.