about jobs advertise subscribe: Email / RSS

GreenBuzz from GreenBiz

Categorized

» About
» Agriculture & Food
» CSR
» Clean Tech
» Climate Change
» Conflicts & Communication
» Conscious Entrepreneurship
» Eco Products
» Energy
» Green Building
» Greenwashing
» Investment & Markets
» MBA
» Management
» Marketing & Branding
» Policy & Government
» Poverty Solutions
» Renewable Energy
» Social Enterprise
» Supply Chain
» Transportation

Worth Your Time

Green Business Links

Sustainabilty

« back to the latest from 3p

October 29, 2007

AskPablo: Is the IPCC wrong on sea level rise?

sea-level.jpgDespite its name, Greenland is anything but green (which I can appreciate since my name is also a bit misleading because I am not even remotely Hispanic -- I was born in Germany...And no, you may not AskPablo about this, ask my mom). In another bit of irony you will also find that Iceland is more green than icy (which makes me think that perhaps there is a Spaniard out there with a really good German name like Fritz, Dieter, or Wolfgang...). This week the decidedly French Jacques asked me about sea-level rise. Is it really possible for the oceans to rise by 20 feet if the entire Greenland ice sheet were to go away?

post-continues.gif
our-sponsor-message.gif

Greenland's ice sheet currently covers 1.71 million km² and, at an average depth of 1.66 km, it has a volume of 2.85 million km^3. Since we know that ice has a density of 0.9167 g/cm^3 we can figure out that the mass of Greenland's ice sheet is 2.61x10^18 g. Since water has a density of 0.9998 g/cm^3 we also know that the melted volume of the Greenland Ice Sheet is around 2.61x10^15 m^3. That's a lot of water!

The world has a surface area of 510,065,600 km², 70.8% of which is water, or around 361,126,445 km^². If we divide the volume of melt-water by the surface area of the oceans we should get a rough idea of the sea level rise. 2.61 x10^15 m^3 divided by 3.61x10^14 m^2 comes out to 7.23 m, or 23.6 ft, which is close to what the IPCC estimates.

But there seems to be something missing... As sea levels rise and low-lying land is taken over, the planet's liquid surface area is going to grow significantly. So, as coastal areas are inundated the oceans grow but the relative increase in sea level will be less. But how much less?

With the help of a GIS (geographic information system) specialist at work, I took global elevation data and figured out what the elevation profile of global coastlines looks like. For the first 600 m of elevation, the surface area of the oceans would grow rapidly, at about 143,000 square km for every meter of sea level rise. So every meter rise in sea levels provides room for an additional 1.43 x 10^11 m^3 (143,000 km^2 x 1,000,000 m^2/km^2 x 1 m) of melt-water.

Using my GIS data I was able to find that the true sea-level rise from a complete melting of the Greenland ice sheet would be closer to 7.19 meters. Despite this more accurate approach, the sea level rise is only 4 cm lower than the number I calculated earlier. The actual number used by the IPCC is 7.2 meters, which is within rounding convention of both of my results. I guess the IPCC did earn that Nobel prize after all...

Pablo Päster

Sustainability Engineer
www.AskPablo.org

For more information on sea-level rise see:
http://nsidc.org/sotc/sea_level.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise

email-updates.gif
» Pablo Paster | More » Ask Pablo

Comments

Join the Discussion

Be patient. You only need to click once to post your comment, which will appear soon afterwards.

(you may use HTML tags for style)

 

Remember Me?

Comments from other sites:

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.triplepundit.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2121

Related stories by keyword:

From Delicious » del.icio.us / Sea+level+rise / ipcc / greenland
From Technorati » / / /

Search 3p

Latest Posts

  • Can Developing Economies Reduce Power Emissions and Still Grow?
    The Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism has come under its fair share of criticism yet its one of few real games in town when it comes to internationally standardized and coordinated efforts to spur emissions reductions projects and technology transfer between developed and developing countries. Researchers at UNEP's Risoe Center are proposing a new methodology that they say addresses CDM weaknesses when it comes to reducing emissions in the electricity sectors of the largest developing country CO2 emitters.

    January 5

  • Ideablob: Making Dreams Come True
    Guest post from our friends at Good Capital: Jack Alter, a Philadelphia schoolteacher, started giving loans to some of his...

    January 5

  • EPA's Love Affair with Carbon About to End
    The Environmental Protection Agency is, yet again, not doing the very thing its name implies. For the umpteenth time in...

    January 5

  • Beyond the Tangible is Where Learning Begins
    by Erin Jacobs Beyond the tangible work we construct as individuals and in groups, is an emotional being connected...

    January 2

  • Profitable Philanthropy? The Values Behind the Figures.
    Around this time of year, big Fortune 500 companies resuscitate their annual giving campaigns, tossing boatloads of cash at...

    January 2

  • Lost and Found
    by Jennifer Pechacek For the past 7 years---through a very challenging journey---I have been groomed within a professional context...

    January 1

  • Leadership by Design
    by Erica Frye The business world has started to recognize something I’ve thought for a long time -- designers...

    January 1

  • An Urgent Resolution for the New Year
    Tomorrow morning, the gym will be quite crowded with new members hoping to start the year off right. It...

    January 1

Dated Archives




mojo-cover-nov08.jpg

live-neutral-logo.gif

PWC_logo.gif

ecosa.gif