about jobs advertise subscribe: Email / RSS

GreenBuzz from GreenBiz

Categorized

» About
» Agriculture & Food
» CSR
» Clean Tech
» Climate Change
» Conflicts & Communication
» Conscious Entrepreneurship
» Eco Products
» Energy
» Green Building
» Greenwashing
» Investment & Markets
» MBA
» Management
» Marketing & Branding
» Policy & Government
» Poverty Solutions
» Renewable Energy
» Social Enterprise
» Supply Chain
» Transportation

Worth Your Time

Green Business Links

Sustainabilty

« back to the latest from 3p

January 28, 2008

AskPablo: Should I buy soda in plastic bottles or aluminum cans?

Dear Pablo, Assuming that one can't break the habit of drinking pop, what kind of container is more environmentally friendly, aluminum cans or plastic bottles (2 liter)?

Aluminum cans take a great deal of energy and natural resources to process and transport. Aluminum begins as bauxite ore, is refined into aluminum oxide, and ends up as blocks of aluminum, a supply chain that can take it halfway around the planet. Next the blocks are heated and turned into large rolls of aluminum before being transported yet again. The sheets are stamped and manufactured into cans, which are then filled and distributed to stores. After weeks or months of travel and processing, the aluminum can is used for maybe a few minutes and discarded.

Continue reading at Salon.com

post-continues.gif
our-sponsor-message.gif
email-updates.gif
» Pablo Paster | More » Ask Pablo

Comments

break the habit and drink water

» Anonymous at January 29, 2008 7:16 PM

Great post and good points. You always do a good job of explaining the simple answer on many of these 'is this better than that' questions -- that as with everything in life cycle analysis, it's all about the assumptions. Aluminum smelting plants are mostly located near sources of cheap, abundant electricity (because the process is so energy intensive). The answer to the original question changes if the aluminum is made say, in the pacific northwest or other area with a lot of hydropower (or in a territory with a lot of nuclear generation), or in a territory with mostly coal. The same thing can be said of the location of the bauxite refining operations. Recycled aluminum has very low (~5% of virgin) embodied energy, so again the recycling rate matters. So, as you said, the easy answer to cans vs. bottles is: neither.

» Costa at January 31, 2008 11:03 AM

...Otherwise, it depends.

» Costa at January 31, 2008 11:04 AM

hey wow thanx for an answer douche bags im tryin to do some h/w

» Anonymous at March 5, 2008 5:54 PM

hey wow thanx for an answer douche bags im tryin to do some h/w

» Anonymous at March 5, 2008 5:54 PM

Everything should be packaged in REUSABLE glass containers.

Fruits and veggies: pint and quart jars w/ paper labels.

Soda, water, milk and other drinks: 2-3 different sizes of interchangable bottles.

Liquid detergents, soaps and shampoos in white glass containers(to keep them separate from clear food containers.)

The same trucks that deliver the products can take the empties back to the bottling plants.

Anytime a new container has to be made it is a waste. Reuse is the best way for the future.

» VicinSea at April 8, 2008 2:06 PM

crap bag

» Anonymous at June 4, 2008 7:49 AM

crap bag

» Anonymous at June 4, 2008 7:49 AM

crap bag

» robert at June 4, 2008 7:50 AM

Join the Discussion

Be patient. You only need to click once to post your comment, which will appear soon afterwards.

(you may use HTML tags for style)

 

Remember Me?

Comments from other sites:

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.triplepundit.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2333

Related stories by keyword:

From Delicious » del.icio.us / Bottles / Cans / Recycle
From Technorati » / / /

Search 3p

Latest Posts

  • Can Developing Economies Reduce Power Emissions and Still Grow?
    The Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism has come under its fair share of criticism yet its one of few real games in town when it comes to internationally standardized and coordinated efforts to spur emissions reductions projects and technology transfer between developed and developing countries. Researchers at UNEP's Risoe Center are proposing a new methodology that they say addresses CDM weaknesses when it comes to reducing emissions in the electricity sectors of the largest developing country CO2 emitters.

    January 5

  • Ideablob: Making Dreams Come True
    Guest post from our friends at Good Capital: Jack Alter, a Philadelphia schoolteacher, started giving loans to some of his...

    January 5

  • EPA's Love Affair with Carbon About to End
    The Environmental Protection Agency is, yet again, not doing the very thing its name implies. For the umpteenth time in...

    January 5

  • Beyond the Tangible is Where Learning Begins
    by Erin Jacobs Beyond the tangible work we construct as individuals and in groups, is an emotional being connected...

    January 2

  • Profitable Philanthropy? The Values Behind the Figures.
    Around this time of year, big Fortune 500 companies resuscitate their annual giving campaigns, tossing boatloads of cash at...

    January 2

  • Lost and Found
    by Jennifer Pechacek For the past 7 years---through a very challenging journey---I have been groomed within a professional context...

    January 1

  • Leadership by Design
    by Erica Frye The business world has started to recognize something I’ve thought for a long time -- designers...

    January 1

  • An Urgent Resolution for the New Year
    Tomorrow morning, the gym will be quite crowded with new members hoping to start the year off right. It...

    January 1

Dated Archives




mojo-cover-nov08.jpg

live-neutral-logo.gif

PWC_logo.gif

ecosa.gif