A fresh approach to looking at business.
Friends of the Earth and five other national environmental and public interest groups are stepping up efforts to block what they contend are at least $544 billion in taxpayer subsidies for the nuclear power industry included in the Lieberman-Warner bill, which is expected to be considered by the Senate in early June.
The subsidies are couched in vague language in a category called “zero and low carbon energy technologies,” according to FoE and lobby group members, which includes Beyond Nuclear, Environmental Working Group, Greenpeace, Nucelar Information and Resource Service and Public Citizen.
“Nuclear is the only energy industry that could fall under this category that does not have a specific carve elsewhere; funding for renewable energy is identified separately in the bill,” according to an FoE press release.
“Although the word ‘nuclear’ has been carefully omitted from the bill, it is clear that this is a covert attempt to bolster a failing nuclear power industry in the name of addressing climate change,” Brent Blackwelder, president of Friends of the Earth stated. “It’s time to focus on real global warming solutions like solar, wind and energy efficiency, not to further fatten the moribund nuclear calf.”
"After 50 years of unresolved safety and waste disposal issues, it perplexes many Americans why Congress would support massive subsidies for the nuclear industry," added John Passacantando, Executive Director of Greenpeace USA.
"Nuclear power is a dirty and dangerous distraction from real global warming solutions. When both Wall Street and Warren Buffet think nuclear is a risky investment, Congress should not waste American tax dollars to further subsidize this 1950s technology."
Though it is touted as emission-free, nuclear power has a big carbon footprint as discussed here:
http://blog.sustainablemiddleclass.com/?p=113.
This carbon cost, like the subsidy in the Leiberman-Warner bill, is hidden by ignoring the entire nuclear process starting with mining and ending with permanent disposal (vitrification and burial).
A good summary on this issue is found in a powerpoint presentation prepared by PeakOil, here:
http://www.peakoil.org.au/does_nuclear_energy_produce_no_co2.ppt
screw you
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.triplepundit.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2588
From Delicious » del.icio.us / Nuclear+power / government+subsidies / nuclear+energy / nuclear+subisidies / FoE / Greenpeace / energy+subsidies
From Technorati »Nuclear+power / government+subsidies / nuclear+energy / nuclear+subisidies / FoE / Greenpeace / energy+subsidies /
July 3
July 2
July 2
July 2
July 1
July 1
July 1
June 30
June 30
June 30
June 30
June 30
 |
 |
Add this box to your site Add your feed to this box |
Let My People Go Surfing: The Education of a Reluctant Businessman
In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto
The Lazy Environ- mentalist: Your Guide to Easy, Stylish, Green Living
World- changing: A User's Guide for the 21st Century
The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More
The Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual
Walking the Talk: The Business Case for Sustainable Development
The Sustainability Advantage : Seven Business Case Benefits of a Triple Bottom Line
Blink : The Power of Thinking Without Thinking
Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution
Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things
