Triple Pundit
A new conversation for business.
advertise subscribe

Site Details

Add to Google

Search 3P


Categorized

» Ask Pablo
» Janice's Corner
» About
» Adaptation
» Agriculture
» Ask Pablo
» Book Review
» Case Study
» Climate Change
» ClimatePULSE
» Communication
» Conflicts
» Corporate Evolution
» Cradle to Cradle
» CSR
» Doing Right, Doing Good
» Efficiency
» Energy
» Entrepreneurs
» Events
» Fundamentals
» Government
» Green Building
» GreenBiz
» Greenwashing
» Health and Food
» Incentives
» Innovation
» interviews
» Investing
» Leadership
» Marketing
» Markets
» MBA
» MBA Showcase
» Numbers
» Op Ed
» Pablo Bio
» Politics
» Presidio Marketing Blog
» Principals
» Priorities
» Resources
» Screw Ups
» Social Entrepreneurship
» Society
» Solutions
» Supply Chain
» Third World Development
» Tid Bits
» Transportation
» Trash to Cash
» Video

Worth Your Time

Green Business Links

Sustainabilty

« Back to Front Page

March 21, 2006

Why Is Population Growth Always Considered Good?

popgrowth.jpgWhy is population growth so often assumed to be a good thing? Is economic well-being really dependant on it? Here's a little article on CNN about the latest US County data on population [LINK HERE]. The language the article uses makes out population growth to be some kind of competition - with a county in Florida proclaimed the "winner". The article refers to a county in Georgia as having the "dubious distinction" of losing the most people.

The Economist recently laid out a pretty good article [3P Report Here] that argues pretty well that well-being of any kind ought not have anything to do with population growth. And, everyone is aware of the problems that rapid growth bring. I hope that in the future we'll have a slightly saner way of looking at this sort of thing and see fewer articles like the CNN one referenced above.

post-continues.gif
our-sponsor-message.gif
email-updates.gif

« comment on this post »

» Nick Aster | More » Fundamentals

Comments

Maybe it's because population growth equals more influence in presidential elections and Congress?

» Icelander at March 21, 2006 5:02 AM

I wonder if it's like a popularity contest -- You know, with people ostensibly moving to places that're nicer to live in...

» green LA girl at March 21, 2006 10:04 AM

There's no consistent way to "grow the GNP" each year without more people. But when's the last time you heard someone question the need for growing the GNP? They think it's an immutable law.

There's also the sick idea that paving more land is good because housing-starts are a leading economic indicator. The construction industry thrives on overpopulation.

Most of what we call economic growth in modern nations is linked to more labor and more consumption. The whole system is a pyramid scheme and people just nod along. Economists need to speak up and tell everyone that real per-capita wealth decreases with more hogs at the trough.

» Enough Already at March 21, 2006 7:59 PM

Join the Discussion

(you may use HTML tags for style)

 

Remember Me?

Comments from other sites:

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.triplepundit.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1539

Related stories by keyword:

Latest Posts

netimpact-logo.jpg

Net Impact Podcast

Dated Archives


cotg.gif

eco-tues-stuff.gif
Eco Tuesday takes place on the 4th Tuesday of every month and is a premier business networking opportunity for people interested in building a better world through the power of business. It currently takes place in cities across the USA. Click here to learn more.

3p Book List


Add to your site!

live-neutral-logo.gif

PWC_logo.gif

ecosa.gif

Best Green Blogs





Provided by First Sustainable

Headlines from the Green Blogosphere


'RSS

Add this box to your site

Add your feed to this box