The Heinz Center Releases “A Survey of Climate Change Adaptation Planning”

The Heinz Center: A Survey of Climate Change Adaptation PlanningMitigating the future consequences of global warming is an important aspect of our current response to climate change.

As the reality of climate change truly begins to seep into the global consciousness we “suddenly” find ourselves in a world of changing weather patterns, a rapidly melting Arctic ice cap, rising seas, stressed ecosystems, and endangered species.

With leading climate scientist Tim Flannery’s recent statement that we’ve already passed a critical threshold of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere it becomes clear that “future consequences” are now at our doorstep. Global warming is real and it is here.

While mitigation is still vital, the focus must also turn to effective strategies for adaptation to an altered and rapidly changing world.   

Adaptation is the Challenge for City, State, and Regional Planners

The Heinz Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment has just announced the release of A Survey of Climate Change Adaptation Planning.

The report explores available adaptation resources and summarizes ongoing efforts to deal with the environmental and economic challenges of climate change. Eight existing adaptation plans and 18 adaptation planning efforts with a wide variety of impact areas are reviewed.

The full text of the survey is available at the Heinz center website.

Established in 1995 in memory of Senator John Heinz, the nonprofit, nonpartisan center is dedicated to “improving the scientific and economic basis for environmental planning and to developing innovative solutions to environmental problems.”

Something we sorely need right now.


Tom Schueneman writes on environmental issues at and








Tags: climate+change+adaptation, global+warming, heinz+center, climate+change+adaptation+planning, environmental+policy

Tom is the founder, editor, and publisher of and the TDS Environmental Media Network. He has been a contributor for Triple Pundit since 2007. Tom has also written for Slate, Earth911, the Pepsico Foundation, Cleantechnia, Planetsave, and many other sustainability-focused publications. He is a member of the Society of Environmental Journalists

2 responses

  1. UK court says Gore is a fraud. August 2007 Update: Man-made Catastrophic Global Warming Not True. In order to be an intelligent reader you must have a basic knowledge. Please do your own homework; a starting point further, flawed NASA Global Warming data paid for by George Soros.

  2. Dr. Coles…. I’m always disappointed when people post things like you just posted. I won’t deny that there are doubts as to our ability to have any real control over the climate and what our emissions and other pollutants have done to it. I also will not deny that there are impacts to “business as usual” as well as to industry that would take place should we (or the Government) take a pro-active stance.
    But it is utter hogwash to say that “going green” has anything to do with some kind of socialist plot. It is actually quite the opposite. The main reason that industry is so slow to change, is that the government has been subsidizing fossil fuels and other inefficiencies for over 50 years.
    Getting rid of those government subsidies and making industry responsible for the externalities of their various pollutants (I’m not just talking CO2 here) – actually letting the market decide – would result in a far cleaner environment and nothing even close to the socialist plot your link suggests. I don’t know if “global warming” is the big issue – but we have made a mess of things and to deny that is complete idiocy.

Leave a Reply