Time to Sell Your Oceanfront Property?

The world’s leading climate scientists are convening in Copenhagen, so we’re expecting a busy week for environmental news, and it begins with a startling report by British Antarctic Survey scientists. In a nutshell, many coastal areas in both the developed and developing world are at great risk for devastating floods over the next 90 years. Bangladesh, Florida, the Maldives, and The Netherlands will all face catastrophic flooding and most of the world’s major coastal cities will need to invest a fortune in flood defenses, according to a story in The Guardian.
“It is now clear that there are going to be massive flooding disasters around the globe,” says Dr. David Vaughan, of the British Antarctic Survey. “Populations are shifting to the coast, which means that more and more people are going to be threatened by sea level rises.”

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report in 2007 estimated that sea levels could rise by as little as 7.8 inches – or by as much as 23.6 inches – by 2100 due to thermal expansion of the oceans. The report’s cautious nature lead to the suggestion that Greenland and Antarctica wouldn’t see much melting for another three or four generations.
Unfortunately, Mother Nature didn’t read that report, and a handful of recent satellite sea studies suggest that Greenland and Antarctica are melting much earlier and much faster than expected, pouring fresh water into the ocean. The volume of twenty-one Chesapeake Bays gushed from Greenland alone over the last three years. As a result, experts now predict that sea levels will rise by between 40 and 80 inches in just 90 years. In that time, the US would have to pay $156 billion just to protect important coastal wetlands.
It gets much worse after 2100, with scientists predicting that the following century could bring a 12-foot rise in sea levels. You don’t have to be a climate expert to know that such an increase would devastate the planet.
The destruction won’t only accrue from the tidal ebb and flow. Rising temperatures are also expected to lead to an increase in major storms. “When we talk about the dangers of future sea level rises, we are not talking about a problem akin to pouring water into a bath,” says Dr. Colin Brown, Director of Engineering at the Institution of Mechanical Engineering. “Climate Change research shows there will be significant increases in storms as global temperatures rise. These will produce more intense gales and hurricanes and these, in turn, will produce massive storm surges as they pass over the sea.”
Last March, a US Department of Transportation study concluded that 27 percent of major roads, 9 percent of rail lines, and 74 percent of ports are at – or below – four feet of elevation, making them vulnerable to the flooding expected this century. Current research suggests the DOT may have have revisit those figures in short order.
Just a week ago, my sister asked me if she and her husband should sell their oceanfront home that overlooks Nova Scotia’s Atlantic coast. A hurricane in 2003 knocked over 27 of 30 trees on the property and flooded their basement. Last year, Tropical Storm Noel ate about 20 square feet of their lawn.
I said that in her shoes, I’d be calling the real estate agents soon.
And that brings us to a very simple fact. The current mortgage crisis and sub-prime lending debacle has affected serious and traumatic consequences across all sectors of the U.S. economy, but can you imagine the cost of relocating half the people in Miami, New Orleans, and Galveston whose homes are a total loss – to mention just three of dozens of cities that will be affected by rising sea levels?
We can work to solve climate change now, and it will be painful. Lord Nicholas Stern estimates that it will consume 2 percent of the world’s GDP if we act quickly. But if we wait 20 years, then cutting emissions – and mitigating endless natural disasters – will require 20 percent of GDP.
That would make the Wall Street bailout look like pocket change.
Photo credit: Dr. Roger Braithwaite, University of Manchester

Richard is a writer and editor based in Halifax, Nova Scotia who specializes in clean technology and climate change. He's the founder of One Blue Marble, a climate change activism blog and web site.

2 responses

  1. I’m always amazed by the gap between the scientific reports and the political reaction. Scientists scare the bajesus out of me with this stuff then the people who can actually make some of this change happen by force simply fail to act.
    For example, Obama is getting a lot of flack right now for infusing that long view in with his immediate actions. How do we get politicians and the public to take the long view?

  2. I think that Obama needs to do a long and concerted sales job for the next year so that the US can pass a forward-looking climate bill in 2010.

    But I also think that people who understand the political realities and the science need to keep focused on the message, and talk to everyone we know, as often as we can (It ain’t easy… I’m driving some people in my family crazy!)

    I guess that I feel like Obama can only carry the ball so far. And that we need to move the goal posts for him so that more can be done.

    But I also think that the Mother Nature is going to send a very strong message soon. Both NASA and Hadley weather offices are calling for a return to record temperatures in 2009 and 2010, and that could focus the world’s attention like nothing else.

Leave a Reply