Why Dismantling California’s AB32 Is Bad for Small Business

By: Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta

When it comes to achieving sustained economic recovery in California, it seems that some individuals, who presently have the bully pulpit, are asking all the wrong questions—and not surprisingly, coming up with all the wrong answers.  They wonder–“What can we do to ‘protect’ California’s economy from AB32 (the state’s landmark energy security and climate law)?”  Their answer (ironically called the “California Jobs Initiative”): Dismantle AB32 through a ballot initiative that could end up costing California jobs, long-term economic stability, as well as improved air quality, which could result in the reduction of negative health effects from air pollution.

A better question we should be asking is: How do we sustain California’s long-term economic growth, job creation, energy security and prosperity?  The answer is not to throw away AB32 and all the potentially positive effects it will bring, both economically and environmentally.

The most comprehensive accounting to date of California’s green businesses, green jobs and green job growth, released recently by Next 10, shows that green businesses have increased 45 percent, with employment increasing 36 percent from 1995 to 2008.  Total jobs in California expanded only 13 percent over that same time period.  In the Los Angeles area, renewable energy generation jobs grew by 35 percent and energy efficiency jobs grew by 77 percent.  Additionally, as the economy slowed between 2007 and 2008, total employment in California fell 1 percent, but green jobs grew by 5 percent.  That is significant.  A surefire way to ensure that these jobs migrate to other states and overseas is to dismantle AB32.

I say “migrate” because if California does not grow these jobs, they will not simply vanish from the global economy – they will go elsewhere.  Other states and countries are developing them now.   Energy, by revenue, is the largest sector of the global economy. Countries like China are already jumping on the bandwagon—investing 12.6 million dollars every hour in clean, safe energy technology.

Having served two terms on the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board, I have observed that too often, critics forget to factor in health costs related to poor air quality.  The Los Angeles Basin and the San Joaquin Valley have the dirtiest air in the nation. It is estimated that our polluted air costs residents in Southern California $1,250 per person, per year due to premature death, chronic illness, hospitalizations, as well as missed school and work days.

If critics succeed in dismantling AB32 not only will our air quality suffer, our state will also remain dependent on the ever-dwindling supply of polluting fossil fuels, affecting our energy security.  It will reduce our competitiveness in the world economic and cutting-edge technology markets.  Make no mistake, other states and other countries, such as Germany, are passing us up when California was once the leader in these fields.  Is that what we want?

California’s history demonstrates that greater efficiency drives economic growth, which better positions our state to compete in the global market.  Today California’s energy bills are 56 percent lower than Texas’ – not because the cost of energy per kilowatt-hour is lower—but because we are more energy efficient.  Innovative energy policies, instituted in the 1970s, have saved California consumers $56 billion and created 1.5 million fulltime jobs with a payroll of $45 billion. Where would we be today if we had dismantled our innovative building and appliance standard policies in their infancy?

AB 32 also drives investment into our state, creating the market certainty clean energy companies need to start venturing into and competing with the fossil fuel dominated energy sector.  Recently Better Place, a Palo Alto company that supplies services for electric cars, was awarded the largest round of clean tech venture capital ever ($350 million) by any U.S. or European company.  Last year, $2.1 billion in venture capital poured into California.

Understanding the political, economic, energy security and health costs of oil dependence and the price tag of inefficiency for homeowners and small businesses alike; business owners, like myself, are standing firmly behind AB 32.  California’s economy will recover quicker and will be more robust, if we choose to invest in homegrown green jobs, increased energy efficiency, clean air and the development of alternative sources of clean energy.

Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta, an Air Pollution Control and certified Energy Efficiency/Conservation Specialist, is the Founder, President and CEO of VPC Energy, Inc and SEETA, Strategic Energy, Environmental & Transportation Alternatives.  She served two terms as the Air Pollution Control Specialist on the South Coast Air Quality Management District Governing Board; is the former Chair of the California Fuel Cell Partnership and former President of the Asthma & Allergy Foundation of America-CA Chapter. She has received numerous awards for Environmental Stewardship, Public Education and Outreach, as well as Leadership in Alternative Transportation.

3p Contributor

TriplePundit has published articles from over 1000 contributors. If you'd like to be a guest author, please get in touch!

12 responses

  1. “green businesses have increased 45 percent … while (t)otal jobs in California expanded only 13 percent…”

    So what. Sounds good unless you analyze it.

    45% of 100 jobs is 45 — 13% of 10,000,000 jobs = 1,300,000. 45? Big whoop.

  2. government cannot create sustainable employment by taking resources from the private sector, write laws that 'demand' the private sector to comply with both in additional unproductive costs and costly, time consuming new regulations, fee's and approvals.
    the very capital and resources the private sector needs to start and run business is the very capital and resources the government will not only be taking in form of taxes, fee's, and bureaucracy, but mandating the now 'legal' methods and materials used under this law will now become 'nonlegal' and in need of
    correction that will result in greater costs to independant, self reliant job creators…

    any resource the government uses has been provided by and taken from the private sector (individual) that the government professes to be the beneficiary of this action…i.e. they are doing it 'for you good'…

    if you want to create sustainable employment and jobs you need to unleash the private sector from oppressive taxation and unproductive costs incurred from layers of regulation, and bureaucracy…

    see, people are in business to hire, they are in business to do business. when demand in market place increases for you goods and services so does your need for resources to produce them.

    labor is one of those resources.
    as business grows via demand for goods and services, his need for labor increases. as demand for good quality productive labor grows, so does rate of compensation…

    if you really wanted to real sustainable jump start job growing via energy, allow more drilling leases right off the batt, same with nuclear, the cleanest energy their is…..there is already GREAT demand for both these energy sources right now, will billions of dollars could be invested in our state..
    -steven j rocker

  3. “A better question we should be asking is: How do we sustain California’s long-term economic growth, job creation, energy security and prosperity? ” — everything must start to your own self.

Leave a Reply