Once Again Fossil Lobby Tramples Clean Tech Startups

The year was 1978. Jimmy Carter was president.  The air was abuzz with the promise of solar energy. No pollution, no oil to run out of, no imports, no OPEC. We hadn’t even heard of global warming yet, but it was still a great idea. The Solar Energy Research Institute began operations in Colorado. Small solar manufacturers and R&D companies began popping up, bolstered by solar tax credits and government research assistance. I was newly a father, working as an appliance repairman, making $7.50/hour. I needed a better job, or better yet, a career. What better than to work in a field I truly believed in. So I went to night school, setting off down the road to what would eventually be a couple of engineering degrees. I did well and was rewarded with a number of job offers. There was only one problem: by the time I finished school it was 1982 and Ronald Reagan was now president. The solar panels had come off the White House roof and the dozens of fledgling solar companies had all dried up like unwatered seedlings scorched under a hot summer sun. The job offers were mostly from defense contractors. I settled on an office equipment company. At least they didn’t use that to hurt people.

Fast forward to 2010. Once again there is a Democrat in the White House. And with the startling realization that man-made climate change has become the biggest threat to our way of life and our future, the air is once more abuzz with talk of renewables. But this time, instead of giving up the White House to an oil-obliged president, we have an oil-obliged Senate that’s refused to pass a much-needed Comprehensive Climate and Energy Bill. As a result, this summer could spell doom for more fragile green seedlings.

According to James Kim, partner at Khosla Ventures. “For companies depending on some type of CO2 subsidy, this is probably the death knell.”

Until Congress puts a price on the emission of Carbon Dioxide, it is impossible for companies to make hard line investment decisions that impact their emissions profile, since they are unable to complete anything other than a completely speculative cost/benefit analysis regarding those investments, not to mention any subsidies or tax credits that could potentially impact purchasing decisions.

That is really bad news for any companies hoping to compete against artificially cheap and heavily subsidized fossil fuels and nuclear. Most experts agree that only a price on carbon that reflects its true environmental, social and political cost can level the playing field in a way that reflects the reality of the situation. This could put a bit of a damper on the enthusiasm we saw at the beginning of the year.

A number of start-ups, particularly those aimed at capturing or reducing carbon like Climos which has developed a technique of fertilizing ocean algae to reduce atmospheric carbon, or Skyonic Corp., which has technology capable of capturing carbon emitted in cement and other manufacturing processes could find themselves in a somewhat vulnerable situation for a while. Skyonic just received $25 million in stimulus money  from DOE to fund a Phase 2 demonstration project involving a cement plant.

Until the issue is resolved, venture capitalists are keeping their distance. “We’ve never seen that it’s viable to build a company whose entire financial success is based around the existence of a carbon tax or cap-and-trade system–especially before you know what it’s going to look like,” says David Berry, a partner at Flagship Ventures.

With no price on carbon, these companies may as well be selling air conditioners to Eskimos. Hey, wait a minute, without a climate bill, that might just be a good business to get into.

RP Siegel is co-author of the eco-thriller Vapor Trails.

Follow RP Siegel on Twitter.

RP Siegel

RP Siegel, author and inventor, shines a powerful light on numerous environmental and technological topics. His work has appeared in Triple Pundit, GreenBiz, Justmeans, CSRWire, Sustainable Brands, PolicyInnovations, Social Earth, 3BL Media, ThomasNet, Huffington Post, Strategy+Business, Mechanical Engineering, and engineering.com among others . He is the co-author, with Roger Saillant, of Vapor Trails, an adventure novel that shows climate change from a human perspective. RP is a professional engineer - a prolific inventor with 52 patents and President of Rain Mountain LLC a an independent product development group. RP recently returned from Abu Dhabi where he traveled as the winner of the 2015 Sustainability Week blogging competition.Contact: bobolink52@gmail.com

5 responses

  1. Pingback: Technology By Day » Once Again Fossil Lobby Tramples Clean Tech Startups | Triple …
  2. really bad news for any companies hoping to compete against artificially cheap and heavily subsidized fossil fuels and nuclear …

    Siegel seems to believe fossil fuels are subsidized. But if this were true, government would be reluctant to let fossil fuel projects go forward. When the Kleen Energy project, the construction of an electric power plant that was to burn natural gas, was heavily damaged by the premature burning of some of that gas, a hypothetical government that subsidizes natural gas would seize the opportunity to halt natural gas project all over the country. (Six workers died, after all.)

    But since, far from being subsidized, natural gas is a big source of money to government, no such halt has occurred.

    The renewable energies Siegel seems to like are all supported by government. Some of the money they get, necessarily, is natural gas royalty revenue. It is as if they were figleaves on the fossil fuel industry’s, um, cash spigot.

    What really puts a knot in that spigot is nuclear power. It is not subsidized, but neither does it burn expensive, and therefore publically lucrative, fuel.

  3. That’s a line often used by supporters of the energy status quo, but it simply isn’t true. Fossil fuels subsidies outpace renewables by more than 10 to 1.
    As for nuclear, the industry simply wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for government money. Over $150 billion has been spent in the US alone.

    I debated whether to include that line since it is somewhat beside the point of the article, but I’m glad I did since this is a common misconception.

  4. Pingback: RP Siegel: Once Again Fossil Lobby Tramples Clean Tech Start-Ups | Ecomentality@LifeDrop

Leave a Reply