Triple Pundit Talks to Bill McKibben

In 2007, Bill McKibben, prominent writer and environmentalist, published Deep Economy, a discussion of our preoccupation with economic growth. The thought-provoking book challenges the conventional belief that more is better and offers an alternative view.  The book demonstrates the case for more localized economies, which would minimize pressure on our environment and help reconnect individuals to their respective communities. Intrigued, Triple Pundit wanted to ask McKibben, who heads the grassroots activist group, more about his work. We gratefully acknowledge his willingness to chat and post verbatim his responses to a few short questions. All feedback and comments are welcome.

Triple Pundit: Who or what influences your work, particularly your 2007 piece Deep Economy?

McKibben: For me, all intellectual paths lead back to Wendell Berry, who really started Americans thinking about these questions at a moment when it was hard to imagine they’d ever even begin to happen. That he’s lived long enough to see the number of farms in America increasing instead of declining is a great joy–and it’s largely his work and witness that let it happen.

Triple Pundit: You write that the “…most important work is simply to crack the consensus that what we need is More.” How or where do we start to do that?

McKibben: Hard to do, since all the institutions of our society have bought into the conventional wisdom that growth is always the goal. But we need to keep pointing out both the ecological peril and the psychological malaise that growth has produced–some combination of these will eventually turn the tide. The question, of course, is if it will happen in time to make a difference to the climate. On that, no guarantees, except that at we’re working as hard as we can to speed it up.

Triple Pundit: Isn’t a localized economy really about sacrifice? For instance, you will not eat bananas or enjoy Alaskan salmon in Vermont. How do you sell that to the American public?

McKibben: By being not grim-faced and austere, but reveling instead in the abundance on offer locally. And if you have the occasional banana, no worries. People have always traded, and always will–what’s key is to build the basic networks to supply the bulk of the food, energy, and culture we need. Instead of the virtues of endless choice, we need to offer the competing virtues of taste and beauty, of stability and durability, most of all of contact with your neighbors. The average farmers market shopper has ten times as many conversations per visit as the average supermarket shopper!

Triple Pundit: Is the localized approach realistic? Have we gone too far down the path of globalization?

McKibben: Realistic? As opposed to what? Raising the temperature of the planet a few more degrees. Take a look at the pictures from, say, Pakistan this summer and then ask yourself what’s realistic.

Triple Pundit: What do you say to those who argue that globalization and world trade help to support underdeveloped nations and foster cooperation?

McKibben: In some cases–particularly China–they have, at least in narrow senses and in the short term. But everywhere we’ve seen inequality rise dramatically when this strategy is tried, and in any event it’s all short-term since we can’t sustain it ecologically. I’m far more interested in the witness of groups like Via Campesina, who represent the vast majority, not the narrow elite.

Triple Pundit: If you could talk to Pascal Lamy of the WTO, what would you say?

McKibben: Could we please have our planet back?

Leslie is a Sustainable MBA student at Green Mountain College. Study interests include sustainability, social responsibility and the power of corporate and non-profit partnerships to bring about positive change. Other areas of interest include social media, fundraising and public policy. She holds a Certificate in Nonprofit Management and is certified in the Global Reporting initiative for Sustainability Reporting. Additionally, she holds an MA in Organizational Management and a BS in Leisure Management. On the rare occasions when she is not studying, she enjoys writing, reading, running, nature walks and yoga. She hopes to use her skills, talents and education to make a positive impact with an environmentally and socially conscious organization. Feel free to connect with her on LinkedIn.

One response

  1. If our President would direct the Senate to work out the state rights concerns of Senator Boxer over national ballast water legislation that she killed in 2008, according to a 2009 report for congress the cost of foreign imports would rise. Unfortunately our president has taken the position that our waters should be governed by a military plan to last 20 plus years starting with another 14 month study coinciding with the Coast Guard plan to mirror the IMO for the first decade. As the report for congress suggesting imports would rise with American legislation that would affect mostly foreign ships the Presidents plan clearly shows a theme to continue our countries policy of economic globalization over economic Americanization or our environment.

Leave a Reply