Fuel Cell Energy: Pros and Cons

Although the idea of using fuel cells to power cars or provide electricity for buildings has popped up fairly recently, the fuel cell itself has been around for a long time. The principle was discovered by Sir William Grove in 1839, though practical devices did not appear until more than a century later. In the late 1950’s Harry Karl Ihrig demonstrated a 20hp fuel cell powered tractor. Around the same time NASA began using fuel cells as a source of electricity for the space program, which led to significant improvements.

What exactly is a fuel cell? You can think of it as a battery that you add fuel to, in order to keep it going. The fuel, which is always combined with oxygen (or air) to produce electricity, can be as simple as hydrogen. This is the cleanest energy source we know of, since the only byproduct is distilled water. However, since neither of these two gases is found in nature in a pure state, they must be produced from some other source, such as air, water (through electrolysis), or hydrocarbon fuels (through reforming). Some fuel cells can run directly on hydrocarbon fuels. Hydrogen is not considered an energy source, but is instead called an energy carrier.

There are a variety of types of fuel cells, including: alkaline fuel cells (AFC), molten carbonate (MCFC), Proton exchange membrane (PEM) and solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC), phosphoric acid (PAFC), and direct methanol fuel cells (DMFC).

AFCs were originally used in the space program, Performance is high, but so is cost.

PAFCs were first generation fuel cells. Quite mature, they have been used to power buses as well as stationary applications. Cost is high and efficiency is relatively low.

PEM fuel cells are often used in vehicle applications because of their fast response time. Cost is a factor as they use platinum catalysts.

SOFCs used ceramics in their electrodes. They run at very high temperatures and do not require a catalyst.  Efficiency is good but startup time is slow, making them unsuitable for vehicle applications. They are used in stationary power applications like the Bloom Box.

DMFCs use liquid methanol as a fuel and is being developed for small applications like laptop and cell phone batteries.

MCFCs are high efficiency, resistant to contamination and can run on hydrocarbon fuels. They run at high temperatures and are being developed for utility applications. Because of high temperatures, durability is often an issue.


Fuel cells that operate at high temperatures are well-suited for combined heat and power (CHP) applications, which increase their overall efficiency. This could be done at a large industrial scale, or at the residential level. Imagine having a fuel cell in your basement that would take in gas and use it to produce both electricity and heat, as well as hot water in a highly efficient manner.


  • High efficiency
  • Clean. Carbon free when using H2 and O2.
  • Can use renewable fuels
  • Do not need recharging.
  • Can run continuously (as long as fuel is available)
  • Provides base load power (good complement to renewables)
  • No moving parts
  • No noise
  • Certain types are well suited to CHP applications
  • Fuel can be made from water which is abundant or many other things
  • Highly scalable–cell phones to power plants.
  • Well suited for distributed generation, eliminating distribution losses.
  • Can be run in reverse for energy storage, producing hydrogen from electricity and water


  • High cost due to expensive materials like platinum
  • Requires fuel
  • Reliability still evolving.
  • Durability, particularly at high temperatures.
  • Robustness. Many are sensitive to temperature and contamination.
  • Hydrogen fuel not readily available
  • Little (but growing) infrastructure for hydrogen delivery
  • Safety concerns with hydrogen (though it is less dangerous than gasoline)
  • Low density of fuel, compared to gasoline
  • Could become irrelevant if batteries got good enough

A great deal of research is still being done on fuel cells, so we can expect to see them continuing to improve, and quite possibly become a serious player in our overall energy mix. Just today, the DOE allocated $2.5 million to develop a fleet of fuel cell-powered cargo vehicles for airports.


What about other energy sources?

[Image credit: DECCgovk: Flickr Creative Commons]

RP Siegel, PE, is the President of Rain Mountain LLC. He is also the co-author of the eco-thriller Vapor Trails, the first in a series covering the human side of various sustainability issues including energy, food, and water in an exciting and entertaining format. Now available on Kindle.

Follow RP Siegel on Twitter.

RP Siegel

RP Siegel, author and inventor, shines a powerful light on numerous environmental and technological topics. His work has appeared in Triple Pundit, GreenBiz, Justmeans, CSRWire, Sustainable Brands, PolicyInnovations, Social Earth, 3BL Media, ThomasNet, Huffington Post, Strategy+Business, Mechanical Engineering, and engineering.com among others . He is the co-author, with Roger Saillant, of Vapor Trails, an adventure novel that shows climate change from a human perspective. RP is a professional engineer - a prolific inventor with 52 patents and President of Rain Mountain LLC a an independent product development group. RP recently returned from Abu Dhabi where he traveled as the winner of the 2015 Sustainability Week blogging competition.Contact: bobolink52@gmail.com

7 responses

  1. The key to the hydrogen economy has less to do with hydrogen and everything to do with the pure o2 that hydrogen electrolyzers make. Currently they just release it into the air as a waste product but that is crazy! Every town in america uses staggering amouts of O2 for medical and industrial purposes and they have to pay a mint for it! For a 4 hour supply of medical O2 here in redding it is 10 bucks and for a 150cf welding tank it is 50 bucks. Why O why dont we just make the O2 locally with a hydrogen electrolyzer and have massive amounts of hydrogen be the byproduct?? Every  bus company that has one operating is doing it at a loss when they could be doing it at a huge profit!

  2. Fuel Cell B-Class Now Rolling In CaliforniaPUBLISHED MAY 16, 2012http://www.hybridcars.com/news/fuel-cell-b-class-now-rolling-california-45955.htmlTHIS ARTICLE SOUNDS LIKE THE OIL LOBBY GOT TO YOU?  http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/orange_county&id=8310315WATCH THE LINKED VIDEO’S … WHAT IS NOT TO LIKE ABOUT WATCHING THE PRICE OF A BARREL OF OIL DROP TO $30???  NOT TO MENTION BRINGING OUR KIDS HOME AND not “securing” some middle eastern oil field in some middle eastern country?  gee sounds horrible… lets keep drilling BABBBBBY!  NOT….HOW ABOUT WE ALLOCATE JUST $1 BILLION OF THE $500 BILLION WE ALREADY SPEND ON “SECURING” OIL FIELDS… AND START BUILDING THESE IN MASS?  WANT JOBS???  OH AND STOP BREATHING DIESEL FUMES OR GASOLINE VAPOR?   

  3. As a advocate for thorium energy for base load power and heat and solar PV for supplemental electricity, there needs to be a clean fuel for transportation. EV’s are not the answer for me, but I am putting my money on hydrogen development for the future.

  4. The process of burning hydrogen results in the by bro duct of water vapor. What happens when millions to billions of these cars are on the road. What severity of flooding will we experience. The water vapor has to fall from the atmosphere as rain at some point.

    1. I respectfully disagree. There are less then 600 million automobiles in the world, and not all of them are used on a regular basis. The by-product of water would amount to an immensely tiny amount of precipitation. Also, a relatively small amount of cars would be on the road at any time. Hydrogen fuel cells are definitely a promising solution to multiple problems that face us today, with few drawbacks.

Leave a Reply