By CC Huang
Last week, China’s State Council and the Communist Party’s Central Committee released a new set of guidelines (English coverage) for strengthening urban planning and development. These guidelines were borne out of recommendations from the Central Urban Work Conference this past December reflecting the nation’s new emphasis on urban sustainability. The last such meeting was held in 1978 when China’s cities were home to less than 20 percent of its population. By contrast, that number today is 57 percent.
This announcement represents a major step forward for urban development in China. For the past few decades, city planning was based on a car-dependent, Soviet model dominated by superblocks, wide roads and single-use districts. By comparison, the new guidelines prioritize walking and public transit options over car use, preserve historical and cultural characteristics, and grow cities only within the means of their natural resources.
In 2008, for the first time in human history, more than half of the global population was living in urban areas, and the United Nations predicts two-thirds of the world’s population, about 6 billion people, will be city-dwellers by 2050. As the world’s most populous nation, China’s urban development will set the tone as urban populations continue to grow worldwide.
The comprehensive principles included in China’s new guidelines range widely in scale, covering a city’s entire geographic boundary down to its streets, blocks and buildings. They also offer guidance on municipal water, waste and energy systems, which are important at all scales. Below, we elaborate on five of the key principles included in the guidelines:
China’s cities are currently dominated by superblocks — enormous expanses of single-use lots (often 500 meters long or more), divided by multi-lane streets with wide, dangerous intersections. This type of environment deters pedestrian activities and strongly caters to the automobile. But the new focus on smaller blocks will significantly improve pedestrian experiences by promoting safer, more pleasant and more efficient routes.
By improving the pedestrian environment, small blocks also reduce car usage and, thus, air pollution.
The new guidelines urge implementing urban growth boundaries based on the ecological “carrying capacity” of the region, prioritizing regeneration and redevelopment in existing urban space. The guidelines emphasize remote sensing technology to ensure growth boundaries are enforced.
In an effort to expand public space, China’s new guidelines also urge opening up existing gated communities, sparking a fierce debate between gated community dwellers and the government. In recent years, China’s gated communities have gained in popularity due to their perceived safety (though there is no conclusive evidence gated communities are safer than open neighborhoods) and privacy, at the expense of their contribution to traffic congestion and inefficient land consumption. China’s Supreme Court is currently challenging this policy to open up gated communities, based on the country’s property laws.
Public transit, when done right, offers the cheapest, cleanest, most convenient mode of transportation for distances beyond walking or biking range. The new guidelines call for megacities to have a public transit mode share of 40 percent, big cities to have a public transit mode share of 30 percent, and small- and medium-sized cities to have a public transit mode share of 20 percent or more, all by 2020.
Part of this cultural and historical preservation involves the rejection of architecture and design styles that blindly replicate large, Western, bland features, in favor of integrating “suitable,” “economical,” “green” and “aesthetic” characteristics.
Peter Calthorpe’s idea of transit-oriented development has been integrated into previous central government policy, and his book with Yang Baojun, one of the foremost urban thinkers in China, was one of the first combining theory and practice in sustainable urban design principles.
The Institute for Transportation and Development Policy helped establish Guangzhou’s BRT system in 2010. The Paulson Institute’s “Cities of the Future” prize has shaped and defined scalable, bold and successful projects in urban China. C40 has recruited some of the most ambitious cities in China to work alongside international cities, creating a mutually beneficial platform to share best practices on sustainable urbanization. The Natural Resources Defense Council had gained traction by creating China’s first Walkability Index and World Resources Institute has created a wonderful set of tools and research to advance sustainability.
Recently, Energy Innovation teamed up with the Energy Foundation China and China Development Bank Capital (CDBC), the largest sovereign financier of urbanization projects in China, to develop the Green and Smart Urban Development Guidelines to help steer the CDBC’s urbanization investments. These guidelines are highly aligned with the principles put forth in the State Council’s new urban guidelines. Each of the guidelines contains a quantified benchmark to ensure that the results of new urban projects can be measured, preventing greenwashing. The guidelines were released as a draft for comment in November 2015.
While China has accomplished a great deal on sustainable urban design, much more work remains. It is now up to local governments and developers to implement these policies. Doing this well will take new management structures, financial tools, and talent.
In short, as it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a robust network of visionary thinkers and doers to change a country’s — and indeed the world’s — mindset on urban sustainability.
Image credit: Flickr/Thomas Depenbusch
CC Huang is a Policy Analyst for Energy Innovation's Urban Sustainability program area. Prior to joining Energy Innovation, she worked at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory on international best practices of energy governance. She has also worked with the Natural Resources Defense Council in their Beijing office. CC received an MPA in Economics and Public Policy from the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University with a certificate in Science, Technology, and Environmental Policy. She also graduated magna cum laude with a B.A. from George Washington University in International Affairs with a minor in Philosophy. CC is fluent in Mandarin Chinese, having studied international affairs and philosophy at Peking University and was a recipient of the U.S. State Department's Critical Language Scholarship.