Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the Summer 2016 issue of SustainAbility's online magazine, Radar. You can download the issue here.
By Rebecca O’Neill
Companies have worked to meet investors’ needs for as long as there have been shareholders. The relationship is complex and increasingly so due to the growing interest in sustainability.
Socially responsible investors (SRIs) are not a new phenomenon – negative screens of tobacco and weapons have been around for decades. But investors are becoming increasingly savvy at integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into investment decision-making.
The level of investor interest has grown to a threshold that is making many companies start to pay serious attention to requests for ESG information. This chart from Bloomberg demonstrates the growth of demand for this kind of data since 2009.
Investors have also increased their sophistication in analyzing the issues. Investors recognize that a company’s strategy and performance on their material ESG issues makes a financial difference.
Yet on the whole, companies are not currently meeting investor expectations on ESG, as this PwC report highlights. This increased demand for ESG data presents a communication challenge for companies. What exact information do investors want? Does the company have that information available – if not, how can they get it? How can they ensure that investors know what the company is doing on ESG?
Sustainability teams are being increasingly called upon to help with ESG information. In a SRI-Connect and Extel 2015 survey [subscription required] it was found that in 28 percent of companies, sustainability departments were responsible for communicating to SRIs. Some investors even go straight to the sustainability contact and bypass IR completely due to an existing relationship or perhaps because they perceive it to be the more efficient way to access the data. In 23 percent of companies there is now a shared responsibility for SRI communications.
There are a number of channels between investors and companies, from questionnaires to dedicated calls and analyst days. Ultimately the two teams rely on each other in order to communicate to those investors that use the ESG information. Sustainability professionals have the deep knowledge of how the company is addressing its material sustainability issues. IR professionals have the financial expertise and the finger on the pulse of their company’s investors’ expectations. The responsibilities are blurred as investors are a key stakeholder and user of company information.
We have carried out desk research and spoken to many different stakeholders in sustainability and IR teams, as well as investors and other experts. The degree of collaboration between the two teams varies hugely across different companies based on a large number of factors such as geography, sector and company culture.
What we have heard is that there is still a gap between the two teams and, as a result, a lack of integration of ESG issues into investor communications.
Understanding the reasons for the gap is helping us to identify some solutions and best practices that companies can apply to enable more integrated and proactive communications. The project is part of our Engaging Stakeholders Network program and we plan to launch the research findings at our Fall workshops in the US and Europe.
Image credit: Anna Dziubinska via Unsplash
Rebecca O’Neill is Senior Manager and Head of the Engaging Stakeholders Network, SustainAbility. Learn more about the Engaging Stakeholders Network workshops on our website.