3bl logo
Subscribe

By signing up you agree to our privacy policy. You can opt out anytime.

Tyson Foods: A Bigger Polluter Than ExxonMobil?

leonkaye headshotWords by Leon Kaye
Leadership & Transparency
hero
Share

Just as Tyson Foods’ shareholders recently voted down a proposal to implement a water stewardship policy, a Boston-based environmental advocacy group has charged the chicken-processing giant of being one of the most polluting companies operating within the U.S.

Environment America has accused Tyson, its subsidiaries and contract chicken farms of releasing at least 104 million pounds of pollutants into surface waters across the continental U.S. from 2010 to 2014. Based on publicly-related data available from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, that amount of water pollution is far more than organizations such as Koch Industries, the U.S. Department of Defense, Cargill and International Paper — and more than seven times the amount that ExxonMobil released during the same period.

Most of the pollutants Tyson has discharged, according to Environment America, are nitrates from fertilizers, which find their way into rivers, lakes and groundwater. Manure from contract farms and waste from meat industry processing plants also contribute to what Environment America says are enlarging algae-infested “dead zones” that can be found from the Chesapeake Bay to the Gulf of Mexico. Furthermore, Environment America and its allies in the responsible investment community infer that the amount of pollution for which Tyson is responsible is even greater. Under U.S. law, however, Tyson is only required to report pollution from its food processing plants to the EPA’s Toxic Release Inventory.

As a result, a coalition led by the American Baptist Home Mission Society and the Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia urged shareholders to vote on a resolution pushing the $34 billion company to improve its performance on water issues. They called for Tyson to adopt new practices that would have limited the polluting effects of nitrates; develop more transparent measures reduce the number of water polluting incidents; draft a timeline of goals; and regularly disclose the company’s process on water management across its operations. That resolution went no where, and in fact, lost by an almost eight-to-one margin.

So far Tyson has ignored the allegations, choosing instead to report on efforts related to community hunger programs and new jobs at a North Carolina bakery plant. Nevertheless, the company has not been able to fly completely under the radar: Tyson was sued in 2014 for a massive wastewater discharge in Missouri. A decade earlier, it was among six poultry companies that paid the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a total of $7.3 million in order to settle charges that use of chicken fertilizer contributed to high amounts of phosphorous in the municipal water system.

Well connected and able to tout its role as a leading employer in the U.S. (although the company faces its share of litigation on this front, too), Tyson has been able to fend off many environmental allegations over the years. But these recent statistics, disclosed by the company itself, has now put the company in the crosshairs of many environmental groups and activist investors that insist the company can do much better.

Image credit: Tyson Foods

Leon Kaye headshotLeon Kaye

Leon Kaye, Executive Editor, has written for Triple Pundit since 2010. He is also the Director of Social Media and Engagement for 3BL Media, and the Editor in Chief of CR Magazine. His previous work can be found at The GuardianSustainable Brands and CleanTechnica. Kaye is based in Fresno, CA, from where he happily explores California’s stellar Central Coast and the national parks in the Sierra Nevadas.

Read more stories by Leon Kaye