SolarCoin: Good for the Environment but Not Social Equity?

Editor’s Note: To learn the basics of SolarCoin and catch up on the first four posts in this series, check out the SolarCoin page at

solarcoinBy Sam Bliss

SolarCoin rewards solar power producers. The early adopters of a technology that helps slow climate change and brings clean electric power to new people deserve a reward, right?

Handing out digital cash to people with solar panels can benefit our electricity systems and the environment, but there might be more equitable ways to incentivize clean energy.

Getting SolarCoins

New SolarCoins enter the online “money supply” when they’re granted to the residents of a property with a solar installation or to the owners of a large solar project. In essence, a new piece of electronic money is created and then given to someone who has enough money to own or lease a solar system.

SolarCoins offer a new source of income — and eventually wealth — that can be accessed most easily by those who already have plenty of income or wealth.

For people without solar panels or investments, on the other hand, the only way to get some of this newly created value is by exchanging another currency like dollars or Bitcoin for SolarCoin in an online currency exchange. As of yet, there’s no way to turn dollars or any other national currency directly into SolarCoins; one must get bitcoins first and then trade for SolarCoins.

Exclusionary opportunity

As SolarCoin scales up and increases in value — assuming that it does in fact become popular — opportunists, cryptocurrency fans, and clean energy advocates will earn income just by holding SolarCoins. Digital currencies are a means of exchange as money, yet in these early days they are more like assets than stable stores of value.

Bitcoin's volatility has made it a poor store of value. Holding bitcoins is a risky but potentially profitable investment, whereas holding most currencies is simply a good way to lose just a tiny bit of real value per year as prices rise.
Bitcoin’s volatility has made it a poor store of value. Holding bitcoins is a risky but potentially profitable investment, whereas holding most currencies is simply a good way to lose just a tiny bit of real value per year as prices rise.

Yet access to SolarCoin, like so many of the most lucrative investment opportunities in today’s economy, is exclusive to those who are already at least somewhat well-off. SolarCoin grantees have a solar-paneled roof over their heads or an ownership stake in a solar project, pieces of capital that earn plenty of income just from electricity sales.

For those who do not have sufficient wealth or access to capital to become solar power producers, getting SolarCoins requires extra money with which to buy them. Those who must spend all their income on food, rent, cell phone service, electricity, transportation, heating fuel, and modern life’s other necessities don’t have cash lying around to turn into SolarCoins.

In addition, it takes some degree of technical competency to get your hands on any ‘cryptocurrency’ — even the widely popular Bitcoin. Exchanging bitcoins for SolarCoins requires further knowledge and training to navigate complex online currency markets like Bittrex, a site whose esoteric charts and unexplained tables appear quite foreign to someone not versed in trading currencies or assets on the web.

Accelerating inequality

In short, wealthy people with leisure time have an distinct advantage in filling their digital wallets with SolarCoins. In a society where the vast income chasm separating high earners from the rest of us grows every year, introducing another instrument that make the rich richer deepens the problems that threaten capitalism instead of working toward fixing them.

Without mechanisms for extending access to the means of producing solar power to poor people neglected by the private banking system, SolarCoin speeds up the rate at which wealth concentrates among the fortunate few. Yet there are some promising developments that can counteract this troubling phenomenon.

The next post in the series will explore existing and potential strategies that make SolarCoin accessible to everyone. Stay tuned!

Sam is an aspiring economist and writer. You can read his work at Sam’s digital wallet does not yet hold any SolarCoin thanks to his technological incompetence, but you can help change that — simply send SolarCoins to: 8Rs7YHL4z5jeNenpMD3X4BnaMZstx7QwEk

3p Contributor

TriplePundit has published articles from over 1000 contributors. If you'd like to be a guest author, please get in touch!

2 responses

  1. This is really among the most baseless articles I’ve ever read. Right now, for the cost of $1 you could buy between 300 and 1100 SolarCoin, depending on the exchange rate. And this business about technical competency is also baseless. If you are literate, which you seem to be after having written this article, you can read about how to mine. All you need is the willingness to learn. If you don’t have that, then who should sympathize?

    A tool for the rich to get richer? Really? Here are those who are likely excluded from the SolarCoin “gold rush”: the homeless, some disabled folks, especially the mentally disabled, illiterate, and those without access to the internet, meaning not even near a library. That’s a very small percentage. As for Solar panels, they’re an incredibly slow way to earn SolarCoin. A $10,000 system would likely generate less than 1 SLR per MONTH. These days, $10,000 in mining hardware would generate just shy of 50,000 SLR per DAY. But buying is even better, $10,000 would buy around 3 million SLR if you could find someone selling that much.

    Next time you find yourself running out of topics to write about, exercise the restraint to avoid baseless class warfare topics. When it comes to Social Equity and SolarCoin, I’ll employ the stereotype police officer line: “Move along folks, nothing to see here.”

Leave a Reply