Sarkozy to Trump: Scrap COP21, and Europe Will Tax U.S. Imports

France, Donald Trump, COP21, climate change, Leon Kaye, Nicolas Sarkozy, carbon tax
Nicolas Sarkozy (center) has threatened Donald Trump with a carbon tax if the U.S. pulls out of the Paris Climate Treaty

Many U.S. votes gravitated to Donald Trump last week because they believed this country had been pushed around on the global stage, and they were not going to take it anymore.

What they did not consider is that Trump’s ascendancy is also motivating many world leaders to flex their muscles and respond to the President-elect in kind.

Take Nicolas Sarkozy, who is hoping to unseat his successor François Hollande next year. In an interview with the French television TF1, the former French president and once again presidential contender said that if Trump pulls the U.S. out of the global climate treaty agreed at last year’s COP21 talks in Paris, Europe should impose a carbon tax on U.S. imports. Meanwhile Sarkozy channeled Trump’s rhetoric as he said that France, and Europe, should no longer be “weak” or “naïve” when it comes to the offshoring of manufacturing.

This is quite a turnaround for Sarkozy, the son of a Hungarian immigrant who upended French politics when he won election as President of France in 2007. Although he disagreed with much of American foreign policy last decade, he was not shy about expressing his affection for the U.S. during his first presidential campaign. French voters warmed up to his blunt talk and brash style, and the center-right candidate won by a comfortable margin in the final round of that year’s election. But France’s economy sputtered, and voters got bored with Sarkozy’s behavior and chaotic personal life. In 2012 he lost his reelection bid narrowly to Hollande.

But Sarkozy is back with a vengeance, and is trying to win the nomination of his party, which ironically has rebranded itself as “The Republicans.” France’s political establishment is threatened by the ultra-right National Front as its leader, Marine Le Pen, has a strong chance at becoming one of the two final candidates in next year’s presidential election. Meanwhile, Sarkozy is trailing a former prime minister and current Bordeaux mayor, Alain Juppé, for his party’s nomination. Hence Sarkozy has made an even harder turn to the right, calling for a ban on Muslim headscarves, the end of pork-free student meals for religious minorities and is calling for a harder line on immigration.

Sarkozy has also backtracked on environmental policies, which he championed early during his first term but then abandoned as the economy soured and his approval ratings cratered. He was criticized for openly questioning whether humans had a role in climate change, saying during an interview that “The Sahara did not become a desert because of industry.” Last year, Sarkozy was also critical of France’s role in the COP21 talks, saying they imposed “incredible risks” upon France.

As we learned last week in the U.S., however, appeals to nationalism and populism are now winning messages. Hence Sarkozy’s outburst reflects a delicate balance to appeal to French pride while assuring Europeans that he is committed to a united continent. Sarkozy’s threat of such a carbon tax would probably not float very far if he became President of France again – and it does come across as an idle taunt when considering the country’s parliament shelved a carbon tax plan last month. Plus such a tariff is the decision for Brussels to make, not Paris. But the lesson for Trump is that when it comes to foreign policy, including matters related to global cooperation on climate change, the more he huffs and puffs, the more huffing and puffing he will foment worldwide. The U.S. business community may be on a current joyride, as seen in the recent performance of the stock markets. But if more uncertainty like this piles on, the sighs of relief may soon give way to exasperation.

Image credit: World Economic Forum/Flickr

Climate & Environment

Recent headlines from the 4936 articles in this category:

Based in Fresno, California, Leon Kaye has written for TriplePundit since 2010. He has lived across the U.S., as well as in South Korea, Abu Dhabi and Uruguay. Some of Leon's work can also be found in The Guardian, Sustainable Brands and CleanTechnica. You can follow him on Twitter (@LeonKaye) and Instagram (GreenGoPost).

One response

  1. This idea is not new. in 2005, my provocatively titled paper submitted to the ‘Committing Universities to Sustainable Development’ conference in Graz, Austria was ‘Sustainability: Why Bother?’. It referenced referenced another paper: ‘A Drop in the Ocean for Foresight Practitioners’.

    In the conference presentation which also recommended an Oxygen Credits system on the basis that a carbon credits system was a permission slip for wealthy nations to keep polluting ( ), the published paper and the conference paper, there was a specific action recommended – a 20% Import tax on all countries who were NOT signatories to the Kyoto Climate Protocol. The author made an allowance for companies who were acting responsibly, by reducing slightly, imports on their specific goods if they were domiciled in a non signatory country. But the penalty still existed.

    I was approached by a number of people after my presentation wanting to know more about the idea, why I proposed it, the implications and so on. There were at least two French representatives in that inquiry group.

    Not long after that conference, France’s Prime Minister Villepin began discussing the need to apply a tax on, yes that’s right ‘Non-Kyoto Nations’ which triggered a backlash response from Australia’s then Prime Minister. Little did he know that the idea was formulated by an Australian Futurist – me!

    So the current idea is valid. Workable, and offers significant leverage. Inside the US there are many big companies doing great work at addressing carbon footprints, waste, water use. They’re making big inroads and do NOT want the US to walk away from the agreement struck in Paris. This imports tax would do much to help gain traction inside the US

Leave a Reply