Wake up daily to our latest coverage of business done better, directly in your inbox.
Get your weekly dose of analysis on rising corporate activism.
The best of solutions journalism in the sustainability space, published monthly.
Select Newsletter
By signing up you agree to our privacy policy. You can opt out anytime.
Coalition MPs have defeated an amendment to a bill which would have placed a ‘duty’ on the UK’s planned Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to promote social and responsible investment.
The amendment, tabled by shadow Treasury secretary Christopher Leslie and supported by some of the country’s largest SRI organisations, was voted down by ten Tory and Liberal Democrat MPs against eight Labour members at the committee stage of the Financial Services Bill.
It has already been announced that the new body will require an increased duty of care to consumers, but 20 social investment heads, including those at Uksif, the National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) and Triodos Investment Banking, had called for an extension of powers to include a CSR element in what would have been the most significant promotion of UK SRI since its emergence.
The FCA, which will regulate financial firms providing services to consumers, would have been required to carry out its work in a way that promotes the development of social finance, and to establish a social responsibility panel to advise it.
Mark Hoban, the financial secretary to the Treasury, said in the debate: “If the words ‘social investment’ were substituted for ‘other sectors and financial services’, I wonder whether it would receive such a warm welcome. The amendment is unnecessary because the whole ethos of the FCA is to promote new providers coming forward, to encourage competition in the market, and not to close the market to others.”
The Financial Services Authority, due to be jettisoned after its colossal failure to regulate London financial services leading up to the credit crunch, will be succeeded by the FCA among other bodies, was also resistant to non-financial interference in the regulation of the City.
Stuart Etherington, chief executive of the NCVO, said before the vote: “In these challenging economic times, social investment can form part of the solution by supporting civil society organisations to become more innovative, effective and financially secure. Government has a real opportunity to capitalise on this potential as it seeks to build a strong and sustainable economy.”
Peter Holbrook, Social Enterprise UK’s chief executive, another signatory to the call for SRI duties, said:“The exclusion of the proposed amendments to the Financial Services Bill is a missed opportunity. The Bill provides a once in a decade opportunity to inject social investment into the DNA of the financial services regulator. Without them, the Financial Conduct Authority won’t be required to consider any of the unique features of social investment.”
Labour MP Chris Leslie, who originally proposed the amendments, has plans for further changes to the Financial Services Bill, which will see the establishment of the FCA, on areas including employee representation and company pay ratios as part of the his party’s drive on ‘responsible capitalism’.
The amendment, tabled by shadow Treasury secretary Christopher Leslie and supported by some of the country’s largest SRI organisations, was voted down by ten Tory and Liberal Democrat MPs against eight Labour members at the committee stage of the Financial Services Bill.
It has already been announced that the new body will require an increased duty of care to consumers, but 20 social investment heads, including those at Uksif, the National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) and Triodos Investment Banking, had called for an extension of powers to include a CSR element in what would have been the most significant promotion of UK SRI since its emergence.
The FCA, which will regulate financial firms providing services to consumers, would have been required to carry out its work in a way that promotes the development of social finance, and to establish a social responsibility panel to advise it.
Mark Hoban, the financial secretary to the Treasury, said in the debate: “If the words ‘social investment’ were substituted for ‘other sectors and financial services’, I wonder whether it would receive such a warm welcome. The amendment is unnecessary because the whole ethos of the FCA is to promote new providers coming forward, to encourage competition in the market, and not to close the market to others.”
The Financial Services Authority, due to be jettisoned after its colossal failure to regulate London financial services leading up to the credit crunch, will be succeeded by the FCA among other bodies, was also resistant to non-financial interference in the regulation of the City.
Stuart Etherington, chief executive of the NCVO, said before the vote: “In these challenging economic times, social investment can form part of the solution by supporting civil society organisations to become more innovative, effective and financially secure. Government has a real opportunity to capitalise on this potential as it seeks to build a strong and sustainable economy.”
Peter Holbrook, Social Enterprise UK’s chief executive, another signatory to the call for SRI duties, said:“The exclusion of the proposed amendments to the Financial Services Bill is a missed opportunity. The Bill provides a once in a decade opportunity to inject social investment into the DNA of the financial services regulator. Without them, the Financial Conduct Authority won’t be required to consider any of the unique features of social investment.”
Labour MP Chris Leslie, who originally proposed the amendments, has plans for further changes to the Financial Services Bill, which will see the establishment of the FCA, on areas including employee representation and company pay ratios as part of the his party’s drive on ‘responsible capitalism’.
TriplePundit has published articles from over 1000 contributors. If you'd like to be a guest author, please get in touch!
