Wake up daily to our latest coverage of business done better, directly in your inbox.


Get your weekly dose of analysis on rising corporate activism.


The best of solutions journalism in the sustainability space, published monthly.

Select Newsletter

By signing up you agree to our privacy policy. You can opt out anytime.

RP Siegel headshot

GM Foods: Heading for a Train Wreck?

By RP Siegel

It really has all the elements of an old-time action thriller: the forces of good and evil, the unsuspecting victim, the damsel in distress tied to the railroad tracks while the locomotive chugs mindlessly towards its destination, and, of course, the dastardly villain causing trouble behind the scenes. I’m talking of course, of the longstanding battle raging over genetically modified foods, which seems to be heading towards some kind of climax.

On the one hand, you have the California ballot initiative that would require all foods containing GMOs to be labeled, the way it is in most of the rest of the world. The way that the industry is fighting this, you would think that the state wants to ban these foods entirely. But all the “right to know” initiative is asking, as its name suggests, is for people to be aware of what they are buying so that they can make an informed choice.

The biotech industry has long held the position that 'if they knew what was in it, they wouldn’t eat it,' (which is probably true of a lot of the foods being sold today) to which their response has been, 'let’s make sure they don’t find out.'

Meanwhile, Wal-Mart has agreed to begin selling Monsanto’s genetically modified sweet corn in their stores all across the country. Wal-Mart is America’s largest grocery store, with more than 15% share in 75 major markets. This will be the first time GM foods have been sold directly to consumers, rather than as ingredients in prepared food.

Food activist Michael Pollan has said that GM foods are not fundamentally evil, though they should be adequately labeled. The food may or may not be evil, but the way that some of its purveyors are behaving is another story altogether.

Take, for example, the way that biotech companies have used their financial muscle to co-opt Congress into doing their bidding. They have inserted their wish list, in the form of several riders into the Farm Bill that would prohibit EPA from reviewing any genetically engineered crop under the Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act. It would also provide an extremely short time frame to hold up the approval of any GMOs. If no objection is raised within that time frame, the new food would be automatically approved. It would also limit any review process to their friends in the USDA. The changes would also make it all but illegal for farmers to grow anything but genetically modified crops. And they would allow GM crops to be planted even if they are deemed illegal by the courts. The sheet audacity of these insertions is absolutely mind-blowing. Is it not analogous to a group of felons kidnapping key members of Congress and forcing them, at gunpoint to rewrite the sections of the criminal code that applies to them? The only difference is that cash and the promise of more cash, rather than guns are providing the incentive.

If that wasn’t bad enough, their lackeys in the House have tried to bypass the standard conference committee process by substituting a more industry-friendly version of the bill that was never approved by the full house, for the one that was.

Fortunately, the Farm Bill imploded, largely because House Republicans couldn’t decide whether they would rather give breaks to biotech, or refuse to spend money altogether. Sadly, this leaves farmers, who have been devastated by this summer’s record heat and drought, uncertain as to whether they will receive any kind of aid. Of course, these are only the latest in an ever-growing list of grievances against these companies, Monsanto in particular, who has made a lot of enemies by throwing their weight around and bullying farmers, legislators and consumers alike.

Meanwhile, the science, like a child hiding under the bed while his parents are throwing dishes at each other, is trying to get someone’s attention. Numerous studies have concluded that GM crops not only fall short of their agronomic claims, such as higher yields and reduced chemical use, but they also pose significant health risks in the form of toxins, allergens and inferior nutrition. A recent study conducted in Russia, also found that hamsters fed Monsanto’s GM soy for two years gave birth to infertile offspring (in the third generation), caused increased rates of infant mortality, and stunted growth. It also caused strange pathologies in some of these animals, like hair growing inside their mouths. The infertility finding was particularly troubling. Most of the testing, conducted by industry and accepted by the FDA for approval, did not follow the animals for three generations. Given these kinds of potential harms, are you ready to feed this stuff to your family?

Speaking of children, Monsanto recently sponsored the release of a children’s activity book entitled, “Look Closer at Biotechnology.” Apparently they want to do what they can to ensure that today’s children won’t have the same objection to this type of food that many of their parents do. According to the work book, which is filled with games and puzzles and cartoon-like pictures of children with happy faces, “You will see that biotechnology is being used to figure out how to: 1) grow more food; 2) help the environment; and 3) grow more nutritious food that improves our health.” What could possibly be wrong with that?

If only that were true. According to Michael Pollan, GM foods will disappear within a decade. Why? Because they do not live up to their claims and they do not provide any value, only risk, to consumers. “We’ve yet to see the GM product that the computer people would call the ‘killer app’.” The whole industry is being propped up by Monsanto’s incestuous relationship with the government, and according to Pollan, the products themselves will prove to be a failed experiment that simply didn’t live up to its promise. “In ten years we won’t be talking about it [GM]. It hasn’t been that successful.”

In other words, if there is any justice remaining in this country, the whole thing will just collapse like a house of cards.

[Image credit: jwinfred: Flickr Creative Commons]

RP Siegel, PE, is an inventor, consultant and author. He co-wrote the eco-thriller Vapor Trails, the first in a series covering the human side of various sustainability issues including energy, food, and water in an exciting and entertaining format. Now available on Kindle.

Follow RP Siegel on Twitter.

RP Siegel headshot

RP Siegel (1952-2021), was an author and inventor who shined a powerful light on numerous environmental and technological topics. His work appeared in TriplePundit, GreenBiz, Justmeans, CSRWire, Sustainable Brands, Grist, Strategy+Business, Mechanical Engineering,  Design News, PolicyInnovations, Social Earth, Environmental Science, 3BL Media, ThomasNet, Huffington Post, Eniday, and engineering.com among others . He was the co-author, with Roger Saillant, of Vapor Trails, an adventure novel that shows climate change from a human perspective. RP was a professional engineer - a prolific inventor with 53 patents and President of Rain Mountain LLC a an independent product development group. RP was the winner of the 2015 Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week blogging competition. RP passed away on September 30, 2021. We here at TriplePundit will always be grateful for his insight, wit and hard work.


Read more stories by RP Siegel