Wake up daily to our latest coverage of business done better, directly in your inbox.


Get your weekly dose of analysis on rising corporate activism.

Select Newsletter

By signing up you agree to our privacy policy. You can opt out anytime.

Jan Lee headshot

Starbucks CEO: Affordable Care Act No Excuse to Cut Benefits

Words by Jan Lee

There have been plenty of stories recently about employers that have used the Affordable Care Act (also referred to as Obamacare) as an excuse for cutting workers’ hours. UPS, the Hamilton (NJ) School District and the city of Long Beach, Calif. have all attributed employee cutbacks to the health care reform that is due to take effect next year.

But count on Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz to buck the trend.

Schultz, who has often been referred to as a bit of a maverick, announced on Monday that he had no intention of cutting employees' benefits or hours as a result of the ACA.

“Starbucks will continue maintaining benefits for partners and won’t use the new law as an excuse to cut benefits or lower benefits for its workers,” Schultz told Reuters in a phone interview.

The ACA will require employers of 50 or more employees to provide health care for those working 30 hours or more a week. Employers that don’t cover their employees can be subject to fines – an issue that some employers feel shouldn’t be enforced.

Schultz pointed out however, that the Affordable Care Act will have little effect on Starbucks, which is already providing health care benefits to part-time employees that work 20 hours or more a week.

The company, which reported annual earnings of $13.3 billion in 2012, reportedly spends more on health care than it does on coffee, a priority that Schultz has strongly supported in the past.

In fact, when a Starbucks shareholder recently urged Schultz to drop insurance for same-sex partners, he reminded the investor that he was free to sell his stocks if he didn’t agree with Starbucks’ employment policies.

But in the interest of accuracy, while there have been some companies that have cut employee hours in fear of having to pay for health care, a study by the Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) refutes that trend.

A study conducted last month found that the numbers didn’t match the hype. Only about 10,000 businesses would actually be affected by the health care requirement, and only about .6 percent of the work force actually worked between 26 and 29 hours in the last year – pointing to the fact that the number of part-time workers since 2012 has remained essentially the same. Therefore, the analysis concluded, while it may appear that there have been a lot of companies reporting cutbacks due to approaching Affordable Care Act enrollment deadlines, there has actually been little change.

“Since most firms in this category already provide coverage voluntarily, it is difficult to believe that requiring the remaining firms to provide coverage or pay a penalty would create such an onerous burden,” the CEPR concluded in a recent statement.

Photo of  Starbucks logo courtesy of marcopako

Photo of Starbucks store in Mission District courtesy of Amit Patel

Jan Lee headshotJan Lee

Jan Lee is a former news editor and award-winning editorial writer whose non-fiction and fiction have been published in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, the U.K. and Australia. Her articles and posts can be found on TriplePundit, JustMeans, and her blog, The Multicultural Jew, as well as other publications. She currently splits her residence between the city of Vancouver, British Columbia and the rural farmlands of Idaho.

Read more stories by Jan Lee

More stories from Investment & Markets