logo

Wake up daily to our latest coverage of business done better, directly in your inbox.

logo

Get your weekly dose of analysis on rising corporate activism.

logo

The best of solutions journalism in the sustainability space, published monthly.

Select Newsletter

By signing up you agree to our privacy policy. You can opt out anytime.

Nithin Coca headshot

Making Renewable Energy Greener

By Nithin Coca
solar-panel-647184_1280-e1435106118439.jpg

The case for renewables is clear: Evidence shows that, even when including production, maintenance and tear-down costs, wind and solar energy are still significantly greener, in terms of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), compared to fossil fuels. This is why news about growing solar and wind capacity in the United States and around the world is an unequivocal positive as we shift to a clean energy economy.

Of course that doesn't mean there aren't areas in which wind and solar could improve and become even more green. But to make clean energy greener, we need good, reliable data. That is what a new report published in the journal Energy Policy, entitled Assessing the Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Solar PV and Wind Energy: A Critical Meta-Survey, seeks to provide to renewable manufacturers and planners.

“[The report authors] examined more than 153 studies on the life-cycle CO2 emissions of a range of wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies, and selected 41 for deeper analysis, allowing the scholars to better understand the emissions of current technologies as well as pinpoint where emissions occur and under what circumstances, and thus how they might be reduced. All the studies chosen for inclusion were peer-reviewed and more than 70 percent were published within the last five years,” the report reads.

Their findings were very interesting. For one things, the authors -- from Vermont Law School and Aarhus University -- found huge variation in GHG emissions. In wind farms, it ranged from 34.11 grams of CO2 per kilowatt-hour produced, to 364.8 grams, with solar seeing a similar rage (1 gram of CO2 to 218 grams CO2). This demonstrated a key point: While solar and wind are, in general, green, some technologies and methods are far more green than others.

Researchers also examined the various stages of a technology's lifespan, and found that the phase that could be most greened is what the authors called the “material cultivation and fabrication stage,” a fancy way of saying building and setting up. This alone was responsible for 71 percent of both solar and wind GHG emissions. A focused effort to bring this number down could really reduce the smaller, but significant, carbon footprint of renewable energy technologies.

Another key – building energy systems that last. The longer the lifespan of a wind or solar installation, the lower its GHG emissions. Thus, a greater up-front cost to build a more durable system could pay off huge carbon dividends in the long term.

“By spotlighting the lifecycle stages and physical characteristics of these technologies that are most responsible for emissions, improvements can be made to lower their carbon footprint,” the report concludes.

This is the right way forward. Let's not be satisfied with green for green's sake. Let's continue to study, gather data, and build better, more efficient, more carbon-neutral renewable energy systems.

Image Source: Pixabay

Nithin Coca headshot

Nithin Coca is a freelance journalist who focuses on environmental, social, and economic issues around the world, with specific expertise in Southeast Asia.

Read more stories by Nithin Coca