Arguably one of the most important things to come out of the COP21 climate talks in Paris last December, aside from the Paris Agreement itself, is the signal sent solidifying the growing shift in the global consciousness. We seek a transformative path forward into the new century. But any desired transformational change requires both the vision for a long-term outcome and a mechanism to achieve that outcome in the ongoing grind of our day-to-day reality.
In a globalized economy powered by fossil fuels, embedded in that reality is the expectation of ceaseless energy to drive nearly every aspect of our lives, at least for some of us. The rest must live either in the shadow of the waste and destruction brought as a consequence of a fossil-fuel-energy economy or start out on their own quest to catch up. Many suffer. Some even resort to violence and anarchy in their desperation.
The Paris Agreement sets in motion a renewed sense of urgency in our aspiration for climate action specifically and a more equitable and sustainable society in general. The more cynical among us might suggest we've heard all this before: half-hearted calls to action that bear little change, leaving the rhetoric in the dustbin of broken promises and hardened souls. It's easy to be cynical.
What is harder is to accept the failures of the past, the circumstances of the present and challenges of the future, and to determine that change is not only inevitable, but that we can also shape it toward a desired outcome. This is the promise of the Paris Agreement.
The two variants to Conventional Worlds are "market forces" and "policy reform." The market forces variant assumes no real deviation from business-as-usual, suggesting an eventual deterioration into one of the two variants of Barbarization, either "fortress world" or complete "breakdown." On the other hand, the policy reform variant of the Conventional Forces scenario, working in the spirit of Keynes and Bruntland, offers the possibility of progress toward a Great Transition scenario. Here we have an "eco-communalism" or "new sustainability paradigm" worldview.
Some may pine after a world of eco-communalism rooted in "pastoral romance, human goodness and the evil of industrialism." But the authors suggest the more likely and desirable possibility, given our present situation, is a new sustainability paradigm. This is a world built out of a philosophy of sustainability as progressive global social evolution organized around human solidarity, new values and "the art of living."
Whether we end up in a scenario of Barbarization or Great Transformation, I argue that one thing is apparent: From our current perspective of Conventional Worlds, we have a choice, even if that choice is making no choice at all (or muddling through, as the authors in the essay define as the last option). By default that will almost certainly lead to a fortress world or complete breakdown.
Our best choice from here is one of policy reform, defined by growth and environmental equity achieved through stewardship, better technology and management. The framework set in place through the Paris Agreement, as well as the Sustainable Development goals, is the first step toward policy reform in a Conventional World that might lead to the Great Transition of a new sustainability paradigm.
Through capacity building, leveraging resources and creating a framework of transparency, the World Bank's Climate Action Plan is an example of how we can get from here (a conventional world committed to policy reform) to there (a Great Transformation rooted in human solidarity and global social evolution).
Of course, it can be difficult to hold in our mind's eye what this transformation will look like, and this is only a small step on the road to get there. But we must look at each step as part of the whole and keep in our hearts and minds the ambition and vision set forth in Paris.
This post first appeared in GlobalWarmingisReal
Image credit: Flickr/Stephan Ridgway
Infographic courtesy of the World Bank Group
Tom is the founder, editor, and publisher of GlobalWarmingisReal.com and the TDS Environmental Media Network. He has been a contributor for Triple Pundit since 2007. Tom has also written for Slate, Earth911, the Pepsico Foundation, Cleantechnia, Planetsave, and many other sustainability-focused publications. He is a member of the Society of Environmental Journalists