Wake up daily to our latest coverage of business done better, directly in your inbox.


Get your weekly dose of analysis on rising corporate activism.


The best of solutions journalism in the sustainability space, published monthly.

Select Newsletter

By signing up you agree to our privacy policy. You can opt out anytime.

Extreme Innovation Meets Behavioral Economics

By 3p Contributor

By Leslie Pascaud

As marketers, we are fascinated by the new and the shiny. The most common sources of inspiration tend to be young, fashionable and trendy. Yes, there are plenty of clever ideas sprouting in Brooklyn’s hipster enclave. But increasingly, we are finding remarkable ideas by looking in the opposite direction: the people and institutions forced to innovate in extreme conditions of scarcity, poverty and chaos.

Contrary to what one might imagine, a wave of invention is emerging from the humanitarian sector, and the type and amplitude of this innovation is far from anecdotal. Humanitarian aid represents a $25 billion business. The needs are colossal and innovation is taking place in virtually every domain -- from food to shelter to sanitation, education to health and finance.

Humanitarian products and services are, of course, designed expressly for the use of those in desperate need; yet many of them have applications that can reach far beyond. Robotics are being developed to facilitate telemedicine; 3-D printers create “just in time” parts on-site for water taps and medical supplies, jettisoning the need for manufacture, storage and transport. New forms of solar energy capture are generating deployable power that can provide light, water treatment and communications at the push of a button. We see growing examples of social entrepreneurs reinventing new ways, as simple as they are effective, to address age-old issues.

Take MPowerd’s Luci Light, an bright, lightweight, waterproof, shatterproof, compactable light designed for reliability in blackouts or extreme conditions. The light looks so great that it can double as a multicolor party lamp. Or, Peepoo: a self-sanitizing biodegradable bag designed for single use as a private toilet in natural disaster situations. The bag, which quickly turns human waste into fertilizer, was designed to address the dilemma of lacking sanitation infrastructure. It is now being used in urban slums where water contamination continues to cause typhoid, diarrhea and other intestinal diseases.

Innovation is not reserved to startups. MasterCard Aid Network has jumped into the fray, providing chip-enabled cards that are pre-loaded with lists of food or medicine to be distributed to populations in need. Card owners can dip them into user-friendly terminals and tap photos of desired items along with a PIN code to receive their goods. It is easy enough to imagine how such technology might launch a new form of transaction in bottom-of-the-pyramid markets, beyond crisis situations.

Cutting-edge collaborations are also taking place between the Airbus Foundation and the International Red Cross. These  two groups  are exploring future uses for technologies like the  ‘e-nose’ gas sensor to identify disease. According to Andrea Debbane, executive director of the Airbus Foundation, e-nose technology has already been successfully trialed on the international space station to detect damaging microbiological contamination. There is potential for use in the remote corners of Africa to instantly diagnose illness through the analysis of breath, without the need for blood samples.

Yet as with any innovation, getting the product right is only half the battle. Human factors will ultimately determine whether the new technologies are adopted and whether the results are replicable and scalable. So, humanitarian innovators are looking to behavioral economics to improve their understanding of what motivates or inhibits people from taking action.

Prestigious behavioral economists like Daniel KahnemanDan Ariely and Richard Thaler have made it clear that humans -- irrational and lazy as we are --don’t always act in their own best interest. The World Health Organization estimates that, in industrialized nations, more than half of the lost years of health are due to largely preventable behavioral factors like smoking, poor diet, drinking, unsafe sex, car accidents, etc. Unfortunately, this irrational behavior extends to poorer nations as well.

A spectacular medical advance can fail miserably if we don’t understand what prevents people from taking medication on time. Products like PeePoo can only make a difference if we can get people to want to use them and dispose of them properly. As Emmanuel d’Harcourt from the International Rescue Committee states in a recent op/ed: “There’s nothing wrong with investing in technological resources, but there is something profoundly wrong about doing so without investing first in the most basic elements of an effective response: communication and local capacity.”

We at Added Value learned this first-hand when working with the Clean Cookstove Alliance in Ghana. According to a Global Burden of Disease Study, toxic fumes from cooking with solid fuels and inefficient traditional stoves cause 4 million premature deaths annually. Innovative clean cookstoves are available. But that doesn’t mean people will use them.

We spent time with low-income rural and urban families in Accra, Takoradi and Ashanti to observe and discuss the role of cooking in their lives, to understand their preferred cooking methods, and to reveal the power dynamics around finances and purchasing. We discovered that health would not be the primary driver for purchase of a clean cookstove. Rather, what women got excited about was the potential to save time in their busy days. The aesthetic appeal of certain stoves provided a secondary status benefit that seemed to clinch the sale. Equally important: We learned that, for any sale to take place, financing mechanisms would need to be put in place that recognized local preferences for  ‘credit,' which for Ghanaian women translates to door-to-door collection. By finding the keys to reducing friction, increasing appeal and leveraging social norming, we hope to have built a plan that will ultimately drive successful adoption.

Of course innovating for extreme crisis situations is far from synonymous with launching the latest watch or motorcycle in a developed market. Needs, context and mindsets are radically different. But the common thread that unites the two is the necessity to understand human behavior and to apply the lessons wisely. Behavioral economic findings can provide the cognitive, social and contextual clues to better frame an idea, to implement it more appropriately, and to avoid the pitfalls that can make the delivery of the best-intentioned extreme innovations a missed opportunity.

Image credit: Flickr/U.K. Department for International Development 

Leslie Pascaud is Executive Vice President of Purpose Branding and Sustainable Innovation at Added Value.

3p Contributor

TriplePundit has published articles from over 1000 contributors. If you'd like to be a guest author, please get in touch!

Read more stories by 3p Contributor

We're compiling all data!