Deforestation occurs at a rate of over 12 million acres (5 million hectares) a year—or the equivalent of about 15 soccer fields a minute. Yet according to CDP, many of the world’s leading retail and food brands are not taking enough action on stalling deforestation, which has a massive impact on biodiversity and climate change.
With countless 2020 environmental deforestation commitments fast approaching, CDP’s recent report on the role of corporations in the struggle against deforestation is as much a call to action as a cause for worry—despite the fact that more companies are engaging with NGOs to take on this problem. If companies don’t step up, young people, environmental activists, NGOs and governments certainly will.
According to the United Kingdom-based organization, of the 306 companies that CDP currently describes as having “high impact forest risk,” these five conclusions generalize the state of the world’s forests and how these companies affect them:
CDP has called out 30 global companies that did not report forest-related disclosures between 2016 and 2018. These include widely-recognized brands that can be found along many a high street or within a shopping center, including British American Tobacco, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Mondalez, Kroger, Macy’s and Gap, Inc.
Social movements are helping to raise awareness about risks related to deforestation, and companies would be wise to follow these activists’ lead. The first half of 2019 alone witnessed large numbers of demonstrations worldwide that urged governments to take action in order to protect the planet from what they described as impending climate disaster. School strikes for climate action, for example, included over 1.4 million young people, from Australia to the U.S., who walked out of school and demanded faster action on climate change. In turn, governments and industries from a range of countries, including Colombia (of which a forest in the country’s coffee growing region is shown above), Norway and South Africa (as well as the U.S.) have been sued over their alleged roles in climate crisis.
Litigation often stems from inaction, and this is where companies can step in and be a part of solving the climate crisis instead of having their brand intertwined with, and signifying, the problem of deforestation. “Identifying risks is a critical element in driving action. [There is] a significant relationship between the awareness of substantial risks and the following company implementation of mitigation actions,” concluded the authors of CDP’s report. “If a company identifies substantial risks, it is more likely to be working to address them.”
Image credit: Leon Kaye
Leon Kaye has written for TriplePundit since 2010, and became its Executive Editor in 2018. He is also the Director of Social Media and Engagement for 3BL Media. His previous work can be found at The Guardian, Sustainable Brands and CleanTechnica. Kaye is based in Fresno, CA, from where he happily explores California’s stellar Central Coast and the national parks in the Sierra Nevadas. He's lived in South Korea, the United Arab Emirates and Uruguay, and has traveled to over 70 countries. He's an alum of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County and the University of Southern California.