Wake up daily to our latest coverage of business done better, directly in your inbox.


Get your weekly dose of analysis on rising corporate activism.


The best of solutions journalism in the sustainability space, published monthly.

Select Newsletter

By signing up you agree to our privacy policy. You can opt out anytime.

Leon Kaye headshot

Why This AI Firm is Underwriting Scholarships for LGBTQ Students

By Leon Kaye

In its most recent survey on the mental health of the U.S. LGBTQ community, The Trevor Project found that almost three-quarters of young LGBTQ Americans say they've experienced some form of discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity at least once during their lifetimes.

To that end, Glider, a hiring software platform that uses artificial intelligence (AI), and Omni Inclusive, a Minnesota-based staffing company, have joined forces to fund a scholarship program that focuses on LGBTQ students who are pursuing degrees in both STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) as well as the liberal arts. LGBTQ students in their second year of college who can prove financial need and have a minimum 3.0 grade point average are eligible to apply for the scholarships. 

Since the companies announced this joint scholarship program last month, they have received more than 250 applicants. 

From Glider's perspective, the scholarship program can open doors to new opportunities for young LGBTQ people, as well as establish trust for how AI can eliminate bias in hiring. While more companies are revamping their hiring processes, and making changes such as eliminating any university grade requirements, bias in hiring is still a stubborn problem at companies during and long after the hiring process. The problems with truly inclusive hiring lie in part due to the growing reliance on algorithms and other next-generation software technologies that weed out applicants, and often those who are people of color.

Such failure in hiring practices can cause hurt all around. At least one study has suggested that while bias clearly takes a toll on employees, it can also negatively affect corporate bottom lines as well.

Still, many feel a lingering mistrust over AI’s impact in the workplace. “There is natural hesitation towards a change of any nature," a spokesperson for Glider said. "Reactions to AI tend to come from a fear of the unknown and a lack of transparency. Similarly, skill tests or competency assessments have and continue to receive pushback from some recruiters with a belief that it will slow down hiring and candidates will not participate in the interview process.”

The Glider representative noted the research of one firm, which found that many job candidates actually prefer taking skill tests to demonstrate their competencies over such traditional screening processes as resume reviews. Further, job applicants who identify as a racial or ethnic minority overwhelmingly prefer skill tests by almost 70 percent. Since such assessments and AI screening can share the same goals, Glider argues that the result can even be a preference among more diverse groups, as AI can eliminate human bias, and do so better than individual people. 

The LGBTQ community has also confronted its own problems with bias in hiring and the workplace, particularly in STEM-related fields. A McKinsey study from 2020 found that junior employees struggle to find their footing in corporate America at a higher rate than their more senior colleagues — and women more than men — with bias among the key reasons.

To that end, Glider says its solution and other AI-based alternatives emphasize the use of questions related to skill tests or interviews, which are then vetted through subject matter experts in their respective fields. In addition, the questions undergo further scrutiny by industrial and organizational psychologists to ensure that such questions are fair and at the right level of difficulty. On that point, Glider says its software’s DEI capabilities eliminate bias from interviews, doing so proactively through a stringent question development process that masks personally identifiable information like names, gender and appearance. The company says it offers both candidates and hiring teams complete transparency while using the product, as its software defines permissible behaviors and rules of engagement to eliminate any ambiguity.

As far as their scholarships go, Glider and Omni Inclusive say their own companies reflect their program’s plan. Glider is a minority-owned company; Omni Inclusive is a is a female-owned business, with the CEO, Wen Stenger, identifying as LGBTQ.

Image credit: lachrimae72 via Pixabay

Leon Kaye headshot

Leon Kaye has written for 3p since 2010 and become executive editor in 2018. His previous work includes writing for the Guardian as well as other online and print publications. In addition, he's worked in sales executive roles within technology and financial research companies, as well as for a public relations firm, for which he consulted with one of the globe’s leading sustainability initiatives. Currently living in Central California, he’s traveled to 70-plus countries and has lived and worked in South Korea, the United Arab Emirates and Uruguay.

Leon’s an alum of Fresno State, the University of Maryland, Baltimore County and the University of Southern California's Marshall Business School. He enjoys traveling abroad as well as exploring California’s Central Coast and the Sierra Nevadas.

Read more stories by Leon Kaye